“Section 10(10)(iii)”

Section References (mined)Section 10Section 10(10)(iii)6 judgments

DNYANESHWAR SHINDE,AURANGABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(1) , AURANGABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1726/PUN/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Pune21 Jan 2026AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Prashant GhumareFor Respondent: Shri Harish Bist

आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण “एक सदस्य मामला” न्यायपीठ पुणे में । IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “SMC” BENCH, PUNE BEFORE SHRI

ASHWANI KUMAR SHARMA,PANCHKULA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD- 1 PANCHKULA, PANCHKULA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 652/CHANDI/2023[2020-2021]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh24 Jun 2025AY 2020-2021

Section 10Section 10(10)(i)Section 10ASection 143(2)Section 143(3)

{ "clean_text": "आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, चण्डीगढ़ न्यायपीठ “B”, चण्डीगढ़\nIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH BENCH “B”, CHANDIGARH\nHEARING

ANIL KUMAR PRUTHI,HISAR vs. ITO, WARD-1, HISAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 691/DEL/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi19 Dec 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri S. Rifaur Rahmananil Kumar Pruthi, Income Tax Officer, S/O Sh. Jagan Nath Ward-1, Hisar. Pruthi, Vs. 165, Sector-15A, Hisar-125001, Haryana. Pan:Aaspp4439J (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 10Section 133(5)Section 143(1)Section 154

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH ‘A’: NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI S

SURESH KUMAR ARORA,HISAR vs. ACIT, HISAR

In the result, appeal of assessee stands allowed as above

ITA 22/DEL/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi02 Jan 2024AY 2010-11

Bench: Hearing Of Appeal, Which Is Illegal. Hence Order Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) & Order Of The Assessing Officer, Must Be Quashed.”

For Appellant: Shri V Rajkumar, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Anuj Garg, Sr. DR

Section 10(10)Section 10(10)(ii)Section 10(10)(iii)Section 147

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (DELHI BENCH ‘G’ : NEW DELHI) SHRI SHAMIM YAHYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER and SHRI CHALLA NAGENDRA

CHANDAN LAL GOSWAMI,HISAR vs. ITO, HISAR

Appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 3620/DEL/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 Nov 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya & Shri Kul Bharatssessment Year: 2011-12

Section 10Section 10(10)(ii)Section 10(10)(iii)Section 250

1 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH “SMC”: NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI SHAMIM YAHYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI

DILIP SINGH YADAV,JAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(3), JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 385/JPR/2022[2020-2021]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur10 May 2023AY 2020-2021

Bench: The Date Of Hearing.”

For Appellant: Sh. Vishal Gupta (CA)For Respondent: Smt Monisha Choudhary (Addl. CIT)

Section 10Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 154

that Government]: 13 Dilip Singh Yadav vs. ITO Latest Notification dated 08.03.2019 for this section is reproduced below: Limits specified under section 10(10)(iii)- In exercise of the powers conferred by sub- clause (iii) of clause (10) of section 10 of the Income