← All Phrases

“Section 2(39)”

Section References (mined)Section 2Section 2(39)5 judgments

THE VARDHMAN STAMPINGS PVT. LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-4(1)(2),, AHMEDABAD

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 363/AHD/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad16 Jan 2025AY 2015-16
Section 263Section 43(5)Section 73

List is attached herewith for\nyour immediate reference marked as an Annexure-32\nThe Exchange was also notified a \"recognised stock exchange\" under Section 2(39) of\nthe Companies Act, 1956 by Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Gout, of India, on\nDecember 21, 2012. (Copy of the said notification is attached ... stock\nexchange as per the provisions of section 4 of the Securities\nContracts(Regulation) Act, 1956 and also through notified stock\nexchange under section 2(39) of the Companies Act, 1956. The said\nstock exchange has also been a recognized association for the\npurpose of section

THE VARDHMAN STAMPINGS PVT. LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-4(1)(2),, AHMEDABAD

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 362/AHD/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad16 Jan 2025AY 2014-15
Section 263Section 43(5)Section 73

List is attached herewith for\nyour immediate reference marked as an Annexure-32\nThe Exchange was also notified a \"recognised stock exchange\" under Section 2(39) of\nthe Companies Act, 1956 by Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Gout, of India, on\nDecember 21, 2012. (Copy of the said notification is attached ... stock\nexchange as per the provisions of section 4 of the Securities\nContracts(Regulation) Act, 1956 and also through notified stock\nexchange under section 2(39) of the Companies Act, 1956. The said\nstock exchange has also been a recognized association for the\npurpose of section

THE ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1)(1),, AHMEDABAD vs. SHRI SANJAY KISHANLAL BISHNOI,, AHMEDABAD

ITA 297/AHD/2021[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad10 Apr 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Ramit Kochar & Ms. Suchitra Kamble

For Appellant: Sh. Umedsingh Bhati & Sh. Abhimanyu SinghFor Respondent: Sh. Subhendu Das, CIT, DR
Section 143(3)Section 145(3)Section 253(3)Section 69C

Section III(m) of the Customs Act, 1962 and the goods so imported were to be treated as 'smuggled goods' as defined under Section 2(39) of the Customs Act, 1962. Therefore, Shri Omprakash Kishanlal Bishnoi was arrested on 01.10.2014 vide Arrest Memo dated 01.10.2014 (RUD No. 36)under

THE ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1)(1),, AHMEDABAD vs. SHRI SANJAY KISHANLAL BISHNOI,, AHMEDABAD

ITA 296/AHD/2021[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad10 Apr 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Ramit Kochar & Ms. Suchitra Kamble

For Appellant: Sh. Umedsingh Bhati & Sh. Abhimanyu SinghFor Respondent: Sh. Subhendu Das, CIT, DR
Section 143(3)Section 145(3)Section 253(3)Section 69C

Section III(m) of the Customs Act, 1962 and the goods so imported were to be treated as 'smuggled goods' as defined under Section 2(39) of the Customs Act, 1962. Therefore, Shri Omprakash Kishanlal Bishnoi was arrested on 01.10.2014 vide Arrest Memo dated 01.10.2014 (RUD No. 36)under

CIT vs. CHAABI ADVERTISING

The appeal is dismissed

ITA - 812 / 2011HC Delhi07 Jul 2011
Section 2(38)Section 2(39)

contribution as made by the Assessee pertains to the emproyees who were the members of the trust which trust was dulyr recognized under Section 2(39) of the Act. fnsofar as payments to AirporL Authority of India is concerned, not only the Assessee produced the license agreement entered into between