“Section 260(1)”

INCOMETAX OFFICER WARD-3(3)(1),AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD vs. HARESH DAYASHANKAR SHRIVASTAV, AHMEDABAD

In the result the appeal filed by the Revenue is allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar & Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokarassessment Year : 2017-18 Income-Tax Officer, Haresh Dayashankar Shrivastav, Vs Ward 3(3)(1), 35, Swetanjali Society, Nr. Ahmedabad Hasubhai Park, Satellite, Ahmedabad-380015 Pan : Bbpps 5719 B अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Arsh Shaikh, Ar Revenue By : Shri Abhijit, Sr Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 25.06.2025 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement : 24.07.2025 आदेश / O R D E R Per T.R. Senthil Kumar:

question referred to it was not answered by the Court and it was left to the Tribunal to reconsider its decision under section 260(1) in the light of the observations. 7.8. Respectfully following the above judicial precedents we hereby setaside the orders passed by the lower authorities and restore