← All Phrases

“Section 125(1)(a)”

Section References (mined)Section 125Section 125(1)(a)1 judgments

The decision most relied on for Section 125(1)(a) is National Textiles v. CIT (249 ITR 125), cited in 134 judgments on BharatTax.

Leading authorities on Section 125(1)(a)

National Textiles v. CIT
249 ITR 125 · 2001 · High Court
134
citing judgments

The levy of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) requires material evidence that the assessed amount does not represent the assessee's income and proof of conscious concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars. A penalty cannot be sustained merely because income is assessed on an estimation basis without positive evidence of concealment.

Radha Devi Dalmia v. CIT
125 ITR 134 · 1980 · High Court
55
citing judgments

When determining income from house property under Section 23, the Annual Letable Value (ALV) can be estimated by deeming 7% of the property's value as notional rent, particularly when actual rent or other clear basis for ALV is absent.

Indian Woollen Carpet Factory v. Income-tax Appellate Tribunal
125 Taxmann 763 · 2002 · High Court
23
citing judgments

The assessee bears the burden of proving the genuineness of transactions, including the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of parties involved in purchases, especially when the parties have migrated or cannot be located.

Balbir Singh (2008) 304 ITR 125/(2007) 164 Taxman 65 (Punj. & Har.) (b) National Taxtiles v. CIT
114 Taxmann 203 · 2001 · High Court
22
citing judgments

An order imposing penalty under section 271(1)(c) cannot be sustained if the Assessing Officer does not make a specific finding that the assessee furnished inaccurate particulars of income or concealed income. The penalty is not leviable in cases of mere disallowance or a bonafide claim.

2008) 304 ITR 125/(2007) 164 Taxman 65 (Punj. & Har.) (b) National Taxtiles v. CIT
294 ITR 185 · 2007 · High Court
20
citing judgments

A penalty order is liable to be quashed if it is based on a finding that lacks legal basis. The penalty order cannot be sustained in the eyes of law if the same is based on flawed reasoning.

CIT v. Sutlej Industries Ltd.
325 ITR 331 · 2010 · High Court
20
citing judgments

An assessee is entitled to interest under section 244A on self-assessment tax paid, with interest computed from the date of payment until the refund is granted.

Bank of India v. ACIT
125 Taxmann.com 155 · 2021 · Reported
16
citing judgments

Foreign taxes not eligible for double taxation relief may be allowed as a deduction under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, if the tax credit has not been granted for those taxes.

CIT v. Dalmia Dadri Cement Ltd.
125 ITR 510 · 1980 · High Court
14
citing judgments

The actual cost of an asset for depreciation purposes is its original cost to the assessee, reduced by any portion met by others.

Judgments citing Section 125(1)(a)