← All Phrases

“Section 10(6)”

Section References (mined)Section 10Section 10(6)6 judgments

ACIT., EXEMPTIONS CIRCLE-1(1), HYDERABAD vs. PHARMACEUTICALS EXPORT PROMOTION COUNCIL OF INDIA, HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of Revenue is allowed

ITA 1199/HYD/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad11 Feb 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar, Hon’Ble & Shri G. Manjunatha, Hon’Bleassessment Year: 2016-17 The Assistant Commissioner Vs. Pharmaceuticals Export Of Income Tax, Promotion Council Of India, Exemptions, Circle – 1(1), Hyderabad. Hyderabad. Pan : Aadcp4643C (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By: Shri Rv. Chalam, C.A. Revenue By: Shri B. Balakrishna, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing: 10.02.2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 11.02.2025

For Appellant: Shri RV. Chalam, C.AFor Respondent: Shri B. Balakrishna, CIT-DR
Section 11Section 11(1)(a)Section 12(1)Section 12ASection 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 144

that the annual subscription fees received by the assessee-trust from its members was not taxable under the said provision? ….. 34. In expounding Section 10(6) of the old Act, which was the precursor of Section 28(iii) of the present Act, the Supreme Court in Commissioner of Income

INCOME TAX OFFICER-1, RAIGARH vs. M/S SUMIT GLOBAL PVT. LTD, RAIGARH

In the result appeal of the revenue is partly allowed

ITA 97/RPR/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur09 Aug 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: SHRI RAVISH SOOD (Judicial Member), SHRI ARUN KHODPIA (Accountant Member)

For Respondent: Shri V.K.Singh, CIT-DR
Section 143(1)

while filing its return of income - Held, yes CO No.10/RPR/18 - Whether, therefore, such foreign income received by assessee was to be excluded under section 10(6)(viii) - Held, yes [Paras 3 and 7] [In favour of assessee] B. The second contention of the Ld. AR pertaining to registration

SHRI SURESH GEORGE,ALAPPUZHA vs. THE ADIT INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-3, THIRUVANATHAPURAM

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 794/COCH/2022[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin16 Jun 2023AY 2011-2012

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Shri Aby T.Varkeysuresh George Asstt. Director Of Income Tax Kurichyiel House International Taxation Payippad, Harippad Vs. Thiruvananthapuram Alappuzha 690 556 [Pan:Affpg5853B]

For Appellant: Shri Suresh Kumar Verma, CAFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 192Section 194JSection 9(1)Section 9(1)(vii)

receipt in India, referring to Board Circular 13/2017 dated 11.4.2017 (PB pg. 56). Also, the salary of all seafarers is exempt under section 10(6)(viii) of the Act. Both the said provisions, as well as the Board Circular, carefully perused, are reproduced for ready reference: - 6 Suresh George ... been credited in the NRE account maintained with an Indian bank by the seafarer. (Subhash Jangala) Under Secretary (FT&TR-V) 4.2 Section 10(6)(viii) is applicable only to non-citizens. Where he is indeed so, and the receipt is by way of salary qua employment on a foreign

AIRPORT AUTHORITY OF INDIA,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, NEW DELHI

The appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 5163/DEL/2012[2011-12 (F.Y. 2010-11)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi04 May 2021

Bench: Sh. K. N. Charydr. B. R. R. Kumar(Through Video Conferencing) Ita No. 5162/Del/2012 : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 Ita No. 5163/Del/2012 : Asstt. Year : 2011-12 Airports Authority Of India, Vs Income Tax Officer(Tds), Rajiv Gandhi Bhavan, Safdarjung Ward-1(1), Airport, New Delhi-110003 New Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaaca6412D Assessee By : Sh. Ashish Gupta, Adv. Revenue By : Sh. Sohail Malik, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing: 24.02.2021 Date Of Pronouncement: 04.05.2021

For Appellant: Sh. Ashish Gupta, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Sohail Malik, Sr. DR
Section 10Section 10(6)(ii)Section 115A

Airport Authority of India  The Article 28 of Vienna Convention, which has been referred by the embassy, had been incorporated by way of Section 10(6)(ii) of the Act, which provides that remuneration to diplomats and embassy officials engaged in service in such capacity would be exempt from

AIRPORT AUTHORITY OF INDIA,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, NEW DELHI

The appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 5162/DEL/2012[2010-11 (F.Y. 2009-10)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi04 May 2021

Bench: Sh. K. N. Charydr. B. R. R. Kumar(Through Video Conferencing) Ita No. 5162/Del/2012 : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 Ita No. 5163/Del/2012 : Asstt. Year : 2011-12 Airports Authority Of India, Vs Income Tax Officer(Tds), Rajiv Gandhi Bhavan, Safdarjung Ward-1(1), Airport, New Delhi-110003 New Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaaca6412D Assessee By : Sh. Ashish Gupta, Adv. Revenue By : Sh. Sohail Malik, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing: 24.02.2021 Date Of Pronouncement: 04.05.2021

For Appellant: Sh. Ashish Gupta, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Sohail Malik, Sr. DR
Section 10Section 10(6)(ii)Section 115A

Airport Authority of India  The Article 28 of Vienna Convention, which has been referred by the embassy, had been incorporated by way of Section 10(6)(ii) of the Act, which provides that remuneration to diplomats and embassy officials engaged in service in such capacity would be exempt from

CIT vs. M/S BABCOCK POWER

ITA - 178 / 2002HC Delhi05 Sept 2014
Section 10(6)Section 192Section 201Section 260A

foreign currency in their bank accounts abroad. These contracts of employment were duly approved by the Ministry of Mines for the purposes of Section 10(6) of the Act. 3. Respondent-assessee did not deduct Tax at Source on the salary paid on the ground that tax was not required ... foreign currency in their bank accounts abroad. These contracts of employment were duly approved by the Ministry of Mines for the purposes of Section 10(6) of the Act. 4. A question arose, whether the respondent/assessee was liable to deduct tax at source under Section

Section 10(6) — 6 judgments | BharatTax | BharatTax