NAMASIVAYAM ARUNPRASAD,CHENNAI vs. ITO, INTL TAXN WARD-2(1), CHENNAI
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed and the stay application is dismissed
ITA 548/CHNY/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai12 Mar 2025AY 2015-16
Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri S.R. Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.548/Chny/2025 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2015-16 & S.A. No. 24/Chny/2025 [In I.T.A. No.548/Chny/2025] Namasivayam Arunprasad, Vs. The Income Tax Officer, C/O S. Ramanathan, Advocate, International Taxation Ward 2(1), No. 4, Srinivasan Street, First Floor, Chennai. Mandaveli, Chennai 600 028. [Pan:Adjpn0394E] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : Shri S. Ramanathan, Advocate ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Shri Shivanand K Kalakeri, Cit सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 06.03.2025 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 12.03.2025 आदेश /O R D E R Per S.S. Viswanethra Ravi:
For Appellant: Shri S. Ramanathan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Shivanand K Kalakeri, CIT
Section 144(7)Section 144C(1)Section 147Section 148Section 69
against which, the assessee filed objection before the DRP.
While considering the objections, the DRP directed the Assessing
Officer to conduct enquiry under section 144(7) of the Act. The Assessing Officer, in his final assessment order, held that the assessee could not explain the source for payment