M/S. INDO NATIONAL LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CORP CRICLE -2(2). CHENNAI, CHENNAI
In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed
ITA 1405/CHNY/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai19 Mar 2025AY 2016-17
Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shrimanoj Kumar Aggarwal
Section 35
find that, these rights ts’ and accordingly, we find that, these rights
within the definition of ‘intangible asset’ as set out in Section 2(11)(b) of within the definition of ‘intangible asset’ as set out in Section 2(11)(b) of within the definition of ‘intangible asset ... Section 2(11)(b) of
the Act and therefore in our considered view, the assessee was legally the Act and therefore in our considered view, the assessee was legally the Act and therefore in our considered view, the assessee was legally
entitled to depreciation thereon