← All Phrases

“damages and compensation”

Business ExpensesSection 37Section 379 judgments

The decision most relied on for damages and compensation is GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. v. NANU RAM & ORS. (18 SCC 130), cited in 41 judgments on BharatTax.

Leading authorities on damages and compensation

GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. v. NANU RAM & ORS.
18 SCC 130 · 2018 · Reported
41
citing judgments

In motor accident claims, this case established fixed compensation amounts, including Rs. 40,000 for each claimant towards loss of consortium and loss of love and affection, and Rs. 30,000 for loss of estate and funeral expenses.

CIT v. Sportking India Ltd.
324 ITR 283 · 2010 · High Court
22
citing judgments

Insurance compensation received for damage to stock-in-trade or raw materials is considered profit or loss from an industrial undertaking and is eligible for deduction under sections 80IA and 80IB of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

ShyamSel Ltd. v. DCIT
72 Taxmann.com 105 · 2016 · High Court
20
citing judgments

Payments made to compensate for environmental damage, even if recovered by a Pollution Control Board on the 'polluter pays' principle, are not allowable as business expenditure if treated as a penalty by the Assessing Officer and the assessee failed to install a pollution control device within the prescribed time.

Nanhoomal Jyoti Prasad v. Commissioner of Income Tax
123 ITR 269 · 1980 · High Court
19
citing judgments

Demurrage paid by a trader is by way of compensation for the use of port facilities beyond the allowed period, not a penalty for violating a law, and is therefore deductible as a business expense.

Manager, Kerala S.R.T.C v. Mrs. Susamma Thomas
2 SCC 176 · 1994 · Reported
18
citing judgments

The multiplier method is a sound and legally established principle for computing compensation in motor accident claim cases, including future losses. Calculations for such losses necessarily involve hypotheses and imponderables, requiring courts to assess the overall picture.

Sterling Construction & Investments v. ACIT
374 ITR 474 · 2015 · High Court
14
citing judgments

Compensation received for breach of an agreement to sell, where the assessee had the right to sue for specific performance and damages, is considered a capital receipt not chargeable to tax as it arises from the 'right to sue,' which cannot be transferred.

Sunil Sharma v. Bachitar Singh
11 SCC 425 · 2011 · Reported
12
citing judgments

The Supreme Court has established that compensation for loss of love and affection should be a uniform amount, often cited as ₹25,000, to ensure consistency across judgments.

CIT v. Smt. Lila Ghosh
205 ITR 9 · High Court
12
citing judgments

Mesne profits received by an assessee for unauthorized occupation of property constitute a capital receipt and are not chargeable to income tax. This receipt is characterized as damages for dispossession or loss of a right to use the property.

Judgments citing damages and compensation

Nan Lion Ship Management Llc, Mumbai vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation) -3(3)(1), Mumbai

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 1857/MUM/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Dec 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla, Jm & Shri Gagan Goyal, Am आयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No. 1857/Mum/2022 (निर्धारणवर्ा / Assessment Year: 2019-20) Acit (Int. Tax) – 3(3)(1), Nan Lian Ship Management 1630, 16Th Floor, Air India Llc Building Nariman Point, C/O- Chamber 2 & 3, Cosmos बिधम/ Mumbai-400 021 Trade Place, Ground Floor, Vs. Khatu Building, Opp-Bse, Fort, Mumbai-400 001 स्थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./ Pan No. Aagcn0478E (अपीलाथी/Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) : अपीलाथीकीओरसे/ Appellant By : Shri Nishit Gandhi /Dhanlaxmi Iyer, Ld. Ars प्रत्यथीकीओरसे/Respondent By : Shri Soumendu Kumar Das, Ld. Dr सुनवाईकीतारीख/ : 03.11.2022 Date Of Hearing घोषणाकीतारीख / : 30.12.2022 Date Of Pronouncement आदेश / O R D E R Per Amit Shukla: The Aforesaid Appeal Has Been Filed By The Assessee Against The Final Assessment Order Dated 27.05.2022, Passed By Ld. Ao U/S 2

For Appellant: Shri Nishit GandhiFor Respondent: Shri Soumendu Kumar Das
Section 144C(5)Section 2Section 44BSection 9(1)(vi)

letting of the vessel as assumed by the Ld. AO. Clause 37: As per this clause the Charterers are entitled to  determine the damages and compensation for poor / low performance levels of the vessel. Even as per this clause specifically clause (d) load capacity is relevant to determine the compensation ... those charges will be on owners account; and lastly, any compensation for non-adherence to loading or breakdown of the vessel loss/ damage, the compensation is calculated on the basis of ocean freight charges. Thus, the hire charges are not independent of the loading capacity and therefore, it cannot