← All Phrases

“Section 80(8)(2)(a)”

Section References (mined)Section 80Section 80(8)(2)(a)1 judgments

The decision most relied on for Section 80(8)(2)(a) is Indian Cine Agencies v. CIT (308 ITR 98), cited in 59 judgments on BharatTax.

Leading authorities on Section 80(8)(2)(a)

Indian Cine Agencies v. CIT
308 ITR 98 · 2009 · Supreme Court
59
citing judgments

The activity of cutting jumbo roll films into flat and small rolls in desired sizes is considered manufacture or production for the purposes of the Income-tax Act.

Empire Industries Ltd. v. Union of India
3 SCC 314 · 1985 · Supreme Court
38
citing judgments

For an activity to be considered 'manufacture', it must result in a transformation where a new and different article emerges with a distinctive name, character, or use.

CIT v. Hindustan General Industries Ltd.
137 ITR 851 · 1982 · High Court
24
citing judgments

The transfer of assets from an existing unit to a new unit does not automatically attract Section 15C(2)(ii) if the value of the transferred assets is less than twenty percent of the total value of assets of the new unit. This decision clarifies when a new unit's operations are considered distinct from an old unit's operations.

CIT v. Singareni Collieries Co. Ltd.
221 ITR 48 · 1996 · High Court
20
citing judgments

Coal mines are considered plant and machinery and are therefore eligible for investment allowance under Section 32A.

CIT v. Tanfac Industries Ltd.
319 ITR 8 · Reported
14
citing judgments

The value of steam used for captive consumption by an assessee is eligible for deduction under section 80-IA of the Income-tax Act, as steam is considered a source of power with a determinable cost of production.

CIT v. M/s. Faith Biotech Pvt. Ltd.
54 Taxmann.com 212 · 2015 · High Court
14
citing judgments

Assembling air purifiers using simple tools and testing equipment constitutes 'manufacture' for the purpose of claiming deductions under Section 80IC of the Income-tax Act, 1961, as the final product is entirely different from its constituent parts.

CIT v. Sesa Goa Ltd.
271 ITR 3311 · 2004 · Reported
11
citing judgments

Education cess is not an allowable deduction under section 37(1) read with section 40(a)(ii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. This is because it is in the nature of a tax, not an expenditure incurred for the purpose of business.

Judgments citing Section 80(8)(2)(a)