“Section 133(1)(d)”

Section References (mined)Section 133Section 133(1)(d)6 judgments

MUKTA AGRICULTURE LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. ITO WARD 10(3)(3), MUMBAI

In the result, ground no. 3 with its sub grounds is allowed

ITA 3211/MUM/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai18 Feb 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Narender Kumar Choudhryassessment Year: 2013-14

For Appellant: Shri N.R. Agrawal, Ld. C.AFor Respondent: Shri Srinivas P., Ld. Sr. D.R

Section 133(1)(d)Section 133(6)Section 143(1)Section 145(3)Section 250

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH “SMC”, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI NARENDER KUMAR CHOUDHRY, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year: 2013

M/S. CITY CORPORATION LIMITED,PUNE vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), PUNE

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 528/PUN/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Pune18 Dec 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Shri Vinay Bhamore

For Appellant: Shri Suhas P Bora & Saukhya LakadeFor Respondent: Shri Ramnath P Murkunde

Section 133(1)(d)Section 143(2)Section 80I

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PUNE BENCH “A”, PUNE BEFORE SHRI R. K. PANDA, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI VINAY

M/S. CITY CORPORATION LIMITED,PUNE vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), PUNE

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 527/PUN/2024[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Pune18 Dec 2024AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Shri Vinay Bhamore

For Appellant: Shri Suhas P Bora & Saukhya LakadeFor Respondent: Shri Ramnath P Murkunde

Section 133(1)(d)Section 143(2)Section 80I

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PUNE BENCH “A”, PUNE BEFORE SHRI R. K. PANDA, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI VINAY

GENUS APPARELS LTD,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE, MORADABAD

ITA 44/DEL/2021[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi26 Nov 2024AY 2011-12

Bench: Ms. Madhumita Roy & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singhm/S Genus Apparels Ltd. Vs. Dcit, Central Circle, D-116, Okhla Industrial Pilikothi Area, Phase-1, Moradabad-244001 New Delhi - 110020 Uttar Pradesh "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No:Aabcn8589R Appellant .. Respondent

For Appellant: Sh. Mayank Patwari, CA &For Respondent: Sh. Mukesh Kumar Jha, CIT

Section 127Section 132Section 133(1)(d)Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 153A

from those parties should not be added as unexplained credit. Again no compliance was made by the assessee. 4. Thereafter the commission under Section 133(1)(d) was issued to the DDIT (Investigation) Unit-1(1), New Delhi by the DDIT(Investigation) Moradabad, for verification of transactions of Rs.50

DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. JAGUAR BUILDCON PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, both the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 284/DEL/2015[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Ms. Sunita Singh, CIT-DRFor Respondent: Shri Rakesh Joshi, CA

Section 127Section 132Section 133(6)Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 153ASection 68

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH “C” NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI PRASHANT