← All Phrases

“Section 8(4)”

Section References (mined)Section 8Section 8(4)3 judgments

The decision most relied on for Section 8(4) is CIT v. Calcutta Discount Co. Ltd. (91 ITR 8), cited in 236 judgments on BharatTax.

Leading authorities on Section 8(4)

CIT v. Calcutta Discount Co. Ltd.
91 ITR 8 · 1973 · Supreme Court
236
citing judgments

Income cannot be assessed on purely notional figures or mere suspicion; it must be based on actual evidence and supporting material demonstrating its accrual or receipt by the assessee. Assessments made without such evidence are bad-in-law.

8 SOT 691 (Mum.) and Gargi Din Jwala Prasad v. CIT
96 ITR 97 · 1974 · High Court
49
citing judgments

The elementary principle of natural justice requires that an assessee must have knowledge of all material intended to be used against them in assessment proceedings, along with a reasonable opportunity to meet or rebut such material, including the right to cross-examine witnesses.

370 (Gujarat) 8. T. Lakhamshi Ladha & Co. v. CIT
6 SOT 18 · 2006 · ITAT
29
citing judgments

Where excess stock is found during a search, the benefit of telescoping may be allowed if additions for unrecorded sales have already been sustained and there is no evidence of other income sources.

A.K. Roy and Another v. Voltas Limited 8
3 SCC 503 · 1973 · Reported
26
citing judgments

The 'wholesale cash price' for levying excise duty must be based on transactions at arm's length. Prices charged to special or favoured buyers due to extra-commercial considerations do not qualify as the wholesale cash price.

8.Ace Multi Axes System Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
367 ITR 266 · 2014 · High Court
26
citing judgments

The eligibility for deductions under sections 80-IB and 80-IA, and related issues like the initial assessment year, demerger, and resulting company status, are significant considerations in the context of company restructuring and tax benefits.

Kishor Mohanlal Teliwala v. ACIT
64 TTJ 543 · ITAT
19
citing judgments

When undisclosed income from 'on money' in property transactions is assessed under Section 158BC, the addition should be a reasonable profit earned on the unaccounted turnover, with an 8% profit rate considered reasonable by the ITAT.

Ltd. (184 Taxman 8 (SC)/ (2009) 315 ITR 460 (SC)/(2009) 222 CTR 213 5. CIT v. Gold Coin Health Food (P.) LTd. (
218 CTR 359 · 2008 · Reported
18
citing judgments

The amendment made to Explanation 4 to Section 271(1)(c)(iii) with effect from 1st April 2003 is clarificatory and has retrospective effect, allowing for the levy of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) even in cases of loss returns.

Parmeshwar Cold Storage (P) Ltd. v. ACIT
49 SOT 67 · 2012 · ITAT
18
citing judgments

A claim for deduction under sections like 80IC or 80IB can be allowed even if not made in the original return, provided the return was filed within the stipulated time. Such claims can be made subsequently, even before the appellate authority or during assessment proceedings.

Judgments citing Section 8(4)

Chamber of Indian Charitable Trusts, Mumbai vs. Pr CIT/ Comm of Income Tax, Mumbai

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 2169/MUM/2021[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Sept 2022AY 2022-23

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey, Jm & Shri Gagan Goyal, Am आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. Nos. 2168 & 2169/Mum/2021 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year:2022-23) Chamber Of Indian बिधम/ Pcit Charitable Trusts Mumbai-400020. Vs. Gala No.328-332, Linkway Estates, New Link Road, Malad (W), Mumbai- 400064. स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aaicc9627J (अपीलाथी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) Assessee By: Shri P. J. Pardiwala & Mr. Sukhsagar Syal. Revenue By: Shri Nihar Samal (Sr. Ar) सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing: 04/07/2022 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 28/09/2022 आदेश / O R D E R Per Aby T. Varkey, Jm: These Are Appeals Preferred By The Assessee Trust Against The Imposition Of Certain Impugned Conditions In The Orders Passed By The Ld. Cit(E), Mumbai Dated 24.09.2021 & 24.05.2021, Whereby The Ld. Cit(E) Granted Registration U/S 12Ab(1)(A) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter “The Act”) & Under Clause (Iii) Of The Second Proviso To Section 80G(5) Of The Act

For Appellant: Shri P. J. Pardiwala & MrFor Respondent: Shri Nihar Samal (Sr. AR)
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 80G(5)

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI ABY T. VARKEY, JM AND SHRI GAGAN GOYAL, AM

Chamber of Indian Charitable Trusts, Mumbai vs. Pr CIT/ Comm of Income Tax, Mumbai

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 2168/MUM/2021[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Sept 2022AY 2022-23

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey, Jm & Shri Gagan Goyal, Am आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. Nos. 2168 & 2169/Mum/2021 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year:2022-23) Chamber Of Indian बिधम/ Pcit Charitable Trusts Mumbai-400020. Vs. Gala No.328-332, Linkway Estates, New Link Road, Malad (W), Mumbai- 400064. स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aaicc9627J (अपीलाथी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) Assessee By: Shri P. J. Pardiwala & Mr. Sukhsagar Syal. Revenue By: Shri Nihar Samal (Sr. Ar) सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing: 04/07/2022 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 28/09/2022 आदेश / O R D E R Per Aby T. Varkey, Jm: These Are Appeals Preferred By The Assessee Trust Against The Imposition Of Certain Impugned Conditions In The Orders Passed By The Ld. Cit(E), Mumbai Dated 24.09.2021 & 24.05.2021, Whereby The Ld. Cit(E) Granted Registration U/S 12Ab(1)(A) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter “The Act”) & Under Clause (Iii) Of The Second Proviso To Section 80G(5) Of The Act

For Appellant: Shri P. J. Pardiwala & MrFor Respondent: Shri Nihar Samal (Sr. AR)
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 80G(5)

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI ABY T. VARKEY, JM AND SHRI GAGAN GOYAL, AM