← All Phrases

“Section 56(1)(vii)(b)”

Section References (mined)Section 56Section 56(1)(vii)(b)3 judgments

The decision most relied on for Section 56(1)(vii)(b) is Joseph Mudaliar v. DCIT (130 Taxmann.com 250), cited in 18 judgments on BharatTax.

Leading authorities on Section 56(1)(vii)(b)

Joseph Mudaliar v. DCIT
130 Taxmann.com 250 · 2021 · Reported
18
citing judgments

The amendment to section 50C(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, by inserting the third proviso through the Finance Act, 2018, is curative and applies retrospectively. This means the tolerance band for the difference between sale consideration and stamp duty value, introduced by this amendment, is applicable to earlier assessment years.

Mubarak Gafur Korabu v. ITO
117 Taxmann.com 828 · 2020 · ITAT
14
citing judgments

Section 56(2)(vii)(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, which deals with income from acquisition of property for inadequate consideration, does not apply to agricultural land purchased by an assessee, as it is not considered a capital asset under Section 2(14) of the Act.

Radha Kishan Kungwani v. ITO Ward
185 ITD 433 · ITAT
14
citing judgments

For the purpose of determining income under Section 56(2)(vii)(b) or 56(2)(x)(b), the stamp duty value or fair market value of immovable property is to be considered as on the date of payment made by the assessee towards booking of the property, where an agreement for purchase and payment of consideration has been made prior to the date of registration.

Ltd. (1993) 203 ITR 108, CIT Vs. Nirav Modi (2017) 390 ITR 292, CIT v. Chemsword P. Ltd.
132 Taxmann.com 173 · 2021 · High Court
12
citing judgments

An order passed under Section 263 is set aside if the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) erroneously passes it without proper justification. The PCIT must have a valid reason to believe the assessment order was both erroneous and prejudicial to the revenue's interests.

211 (Mumbai Trib) and (iii) Ashutosh Jha v. ITO
190 ITD 450 · ITAT
12
citing judgments

Section 56(2)(x) cannot be applied retrospectively to transactions entered into before its incorporation in the statute.

CIT v. Madan Teatres Ltd.
260 CTR 75 · 2013 · High Court
12
citing judgments

Penalty cannot be imposed when the addition to income is solely on account of the valuation officer's estimation of fair market value.

Judgments citing Section 56(1)(vii)(b)

Section 56(1)(vii)(b) — 3 case laws | BharatTax