← All Phrases

“Section 33(2)”

Section References (mined)Section 33Section 33(2)6 judgments

The decision most relied on for Section 33(2) is M/s Mahadev Cold Storage v. Jurisdictional AO (43 Taxmann.com 33), cited in 262 judgments on BharatTax.

Leading authorities on Section 33(2)

M/s Mahadev Cold Storage v. Jurisdictional AO
43 Taxmann.com 33 · 2014 · High Court
262
citing judgments

Employees' contributions to welfare funds are an allowable deduction if paid before the due date for filing the income-tax return under section 139(1), even if the payment is made beyond the due date specified by the respective welfare fund Acts, as per the provisions of section 43B.

R.B. Jessaram Fatehchand (Sugar Dept.) v. CIT
75 ITR 33 · 1970 · High Court
63
citing judgments

The mere absence of customer addresses, particularly for cash sales, in the books of account is not a sufficient ground to reject the books or to cast suspicion on the genuineness of the transactions.

Sohan Lal Gupta v. CIT
33 ITR 786 · 1958 · High Court
56
citing judgments

Tax authorities cannot reject an assessee's affidavit or a retraction of an admission of income without providing an opportunity to substantiate the claims or cross-examine the deponent. Simply lacking documentary evidence is not sufficient ground for outright rejection of such evidence.

D’Souza, Mangaluru Page 33 of 41 CIT(Bom) 137 ITR 58; Assam Pesticides &Agro Chemicals v. CIT(Gau)
227 ITR 846 · 1997 · High Court
33
citing judgments

Expenditure is deductible under section 37 only if it is incurred wholly and exclusively for the purpose of business. The mere fact that a payment is made under a contract does not conclusively establish it as a business expense.

CIT vs. Macmillan (SC) 33 ITR 182 4. Jagarnath v. CIT 2 ITC 4, CIT vs. Nawaz
22 ITR 502 · 1952 · High Court
30
citing judgments

The case establishes that the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has the power to confirm, reduce, or annul the assessment or penalty, as defined under Section 251(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. This power extends to all the matters which the Appellate Assistant Commissioner (AAC) could have considered.

275(Delhi); Pr. CIT v. West Bengal Infrastructure Development Finance Corpn Ltd.
143 Taxmann.com 135 · 2022 · High Court
25
citing judgments

Where an expense is incurred for the purpose of acquiring a capital asset, and that asset is subsequently sold, the expenditure must be considered as part of the cost of acquisition of that asset for the purpose of calculating capital gains. This is because the expense forms an integral part of the cost of acquiring the asset, not an expenditure of revenue nature.

DCIT v. Toyo Engineering India ltd.
33 Taxmann.com 560 · 2013 · Reported
22
citing judgments

Depreciation is not allowed on goodwill if it arises from book entries and has no identifiable cost of acquisition. This applies even when goodwill is acquired as part of a scheme of arrangement or amalgamation.

Dakshina Kannada Nirmithi Kendra, Manguluru Page 33 of 176 4.17 In Yogiraj Charity Trust v. CIT
103 ITR 777 · 1976 · Supreme Court
20
citing judgments

If the primary purpose of a trust is charitable, an ancillary object that is not itself charitable will not disqualify the trust from being considered a valid charity.

Judgments citing Section 33(2)

DCIT, Circle - 3(1), Kolkata vs. M/S. R. Piyarelall Import & Export Ltd., Kolkata

In the result, the captioned appeals stand dismissed

ITA 695/KOL/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata03 Jun 2024AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Rakesh Mishrai.T.A. Nos.690&691/Kol/2018 Assessment Years: 2011-12 & 2012-13 M/S R. Piyarelall Import & Export Ltd....................…...……………....Appellant 12, Govt. Place (E), Kolkata – 700069. [Pan:Aabcr2695G] Vs. Acit, Range-3, Kolkata…….……………............................…..…..... Respondent I.T.A. No.695/Kol/2018 Assessment Year: 2011-12 Dcit, Circle-3(1), Kolkata.....................................…...……………....Cross-Objector Vs. M/S R. Piyarelall Import & Export Ltd …….…......................…..…..... Respondent 12, Govt. Place (E), Kolkata – 700069. [Pan:Aabcr2695G] Appearances By: None Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee. Shri Rakesh Kumar Das, Cit-Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Revenue. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : June 03, 2024 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : June 03, 2024 आदेश / Order संजय गग", "या"यक सद"य "वारा / Per Sanjay Garg: The Captioned Are The Cross-Appeals Against The Order Dated 04.01.2018 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, Kolkata [Hereinafter Referred To As ‘Cit(A)’] For Assessment Year 2011-12, One Preferred By The Assessee & The Other By The Revenue Bearing Ita No.690/Kol/2018 & Ita No.695/Kol/2018 Respectively; Whereas Ita No.691/Kol/2018 Is The Appeal Of The Assessee For Assessment Year 2012-13 Against The Order Of The Cit(A) Dated 28.12.2017. 2. No One Has Put In Appearance On Behalf Of The Assessee.

Section 33(2)

Overseas Trade Limited (the assessee herein), the Hon’ble NCLT has ordered the corporate debtor (the assessee) to be liquidated in terms of section 33(2) of Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016 and as per the order dated 06.01.2021, the NCLT has declared a moratorium against the initiation of any suit

M/S. R. Piyarelall Import & Export Ltd., Kolkata vs. JCIT, Range - 3, Kolkata

In the result, the captioned appeals stand dismissed

ITA 691/KOL/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata03 Jun 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Rakesh Mishrai.T.A. Nos.690&691/Kol/2018 Assessment Years: 2011-12 & 2012-13 M/S R. Piyarelall Import & Export Ltd....................…...……………....Appellant 12, Govt. Place (E), Kolkata – 700069. [Pan:Aabcr2695G] Vs. Acit, Range-3, Kolkata…….……………............................…..…..... Respondent I.T.A. No.695/Kol/2018 Assessment Year: 2011-12 Dcit, Circle-3(1), Kolkata.....................................…...……………....Cross-Objector Vs. M/S R. Piyarelall Import & Export Ltd …….…......................…..…..... Respondent 12, Govt. Place (E), Kolkata – 700069. [Pan:Aabcr2695G] Appearances By: None Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee. Shri Rakesh Kumar Das, Cit-Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Revenue. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : June 03, 2024 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : June 03, 2024 आदेश / Order संजय गग", "या"यक सद"य "वारा / Per Sanjay Garg: The Captioned Are The Cross-Appeals Against The Order Dated 04.01.2018 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, Kolkata [Hereinafter Referred To As ‘Cit(A)’] For Assessment Year 2011-12, One Preferred By The Assessee & The Other By The Revenue Bearing Ita No.690/Kol/2018 & Ita No.695/Kol/2018 Respectively; Whereas Ita No.691/Kol/2018 Is The Appeal Of The Assessee For Assessment Year 2012-13 Against The Order Of The Cit(A) Dated 28.12.2017. 2. No One Has Put In Appearance On Behalf Of The Assessee.

Section 33(2)

Overseas Trade Limited (the assessee herein), the Hon’ble NCLT has ordered the corporate debtor (the assessee) to be liquidated in terms of section 33(2) of Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016 and as per the order dated 06.01.2021, the NCLT has declared a moratorium against the initiation of any suit

M/S. R. Piyarelall Import & Export Ltd., Kolkata vs. Additional CIT, Range - 3, Kolkata

In the result, the captioned appeals stand dismissed

ITA 690/KOL/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata03 Jun 2024AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Rakesh Mishrai.T.A. Nos.690&691/Kol/2018 Assessment Years: 2011-12 & 2012-13 M/S R. Piyarelall Import & Export Ltd....................…...……………....Appellant 12, Govt. Place (E), Kolkata – 700069. [Pan:Aabcr2695G] Vs. Acit, Range-3, Kolkata…….……………............................…..…..... Respondent I.T.A. No.695/Kol/2018 Assessment Year: 2011-12 Dcit, Circle-3(1), Kolkata.....................................…...……………....Cross-Objector Vs. M/S R. Piyarelall Import & Export Ltd …….…......................…..…..... Respondent 12, Govt. Place (E), Kolkata – 700069. [Pan:Aabcr2695G] Appearances By: None Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee. Shri Rakesh Kumar Das, Cit-Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Revenue. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : June 03, 2024 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : June 03, 2024 आदेश / Order संजय गग", "या"यक सद"य "वारा / Per Sanjay Garg: The Captioned Are The Cross-Appeals Against The Order Dated 04.01.2018 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, Kolkata [Hereinafter Referred To As ‘Cit(A)’] For Assessment Year 2011-12, One Preferred By The Assessee & The Other By The Revenue Bearing Ita No.690/Kol/2018 & Ita No.695/Kol/2018 Respectively; Whereas Ita No.691/Kol/2018 Is The Appeal Of The Assessee For Assessment Year 2012-13 Against The Order Of The Cit(A) Dated 28.12.2017. 2. No One Has Put In Appearance On Behalf Of The Assessee.

Section 33(2)

Overseas Trade Limited (the assessee herein), the Hon’ble NCLT has ordered the corporate debtor (the assessee) to be liquidated in terms of section 33(2) of Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016 and as per the order dated 06.01.2021, the NCLT has declared a moratorium against the initiation of any suit