MAJLIS E KHUDDAMUL MADARI S,MUMBAI vs. ITO EXEM. WARD 2(1), MUMBAI
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 5146/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Oct 2025AY 2017-18
Bench: Shri Vikram Singh Yadav & Shri Raj Kumar Chauhanassessment Year : 2017-18 Majlis E Khuddamul Madari S, Ito(Exem), Ward-2(1), 14, Uasim Mansion, Room No. 512, 5Th Floor, Koleueheri Village, Vs. Piramal Chambers, Chinchpada, Lal Baug, Parel, Kalina, Mumbai-400012. Mumbai-400098. Pan : Aaaam0694F (Appellant) (Respondent) For Assessee : None For Revenue : Shri Surendra Mohan, Sr.Dr Date Of Hearing : 16-10-2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 27-10-2025 O R D E R Per Vikram Singh Yadav, A.M : This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi [„Ld.Cit(A)‟], Dated 25-06-2025, Pertaining To Assessment Year (Ay) 2017-18, Wherein The Assessee Has Taken The Following Grounds Of Appeal:
For Appellant: NONEFor Respondent: Shri Surendra Mohan, Sr.DR
Section 11Section 12ASection 144Section 250Section 68
filed part details viz copy of trust deed, copy of bank statements, copy of report of an auditor relating to accounts audited under section 33(2) and 34 and rule 19 of the Bombay Public Trust Act alongwith copy of balance sheet as on 31.07.2017 and income & expenditure account