← All Phrases
“Section 221(2)”
Section References (mined)Section 221Section 221(2)1 judgments
The decision most relied on for Section 221(2) is CIT v. Chettinad Logistics (P) Ltd. (80 Taxmann.com 221), cited in 444 judgments on BharatTax.
Leading authorities on Section 221(2)
CIT v. Chettinad Logistics (P) Ltd.
80 Taxmann.com 221 · 2017 · High Court
444
citing judgments
Section 14A cannot be invoked to disallow expenditure if the assessee has not earned any exempt income in the relevant assessment year. The Explanation to Section 14A is prospective in nature.
CIT Vs. L&T Ltd (2009) 313 ITR 1 (SC0 2. CIT Vs. ITI Ltd. (2009) 221 CTR (SC) 609 3. CIT v. Gostino Mario & Others
323 ITR 670 · 2010 · High Court
62
citing judgments
An assessee-employer is not bound to collect and verify proof of journey and actual expenditure before granting exemption under Section 10(5).
CIT v. K. S. Venkatksubbiah Reddiar
221 ITR 18 · High Court
27
citing judgments
An activity is considered business if it involves a continuous course of activity and is carried on with a profit motive.
CIT v. Singareni Collieries Co. Ltd.
221 ITR 48 · 1996 · High Court
20
citing judgments
Coal mines are considered plant and machinery and are therefore eligible for investment allowance under Section 32A.