← All Phrases

“Section 54(4)”

Section References (mined)Section 54Section 54(4)5 judgments

The decision most relied on for Section 54(4) is CIT v. Rajesh Kumar Jalan (286 ITR 274), cited in 66 judgments on BharatTax.

Leading authorities on Section 54(4)

CIT v. Rajesh Kumar Jalan
286 ITR 274 · 2006 · High Court
66
citing judgments

Section 139(4) of the Income-tax Act, which allows for filing a belated return, acts as a proviso to Section 139(1). Consequently, the time limit for depositing amounts or utilizing funds to claim exemptions, such as under Section 54, extends up to the due date for filing a return under Section 139(4).

CIT v. Ms. Jagriti Aggarwal
339 ITR 610 · 2011 · High Court
66
citing judgments

A return of income filed within the period allowed under Section 139(4) is valid for claiming exemptions and deductions, including those under Sections 54, 54F, and 80AC. However, depositing the unutilized capital gains in the Capital Gains Account Scheme is a statutory and mandatory requirement for claiming exemption under Section 54F.

CIT v. K. Ramachandra Rao
56 Taxmann.com 163 · 2015 · High Court
62
citing judgments

The exemption under Section 54F (or Section 54) for long-term capital gains cannot be denied if the assessee invests the entire sale consideration in constructing a residential house within the prescribed three-year period, even if the amount was not deposited in the Capital Gains Account Scheme before the due date for filing the income tax return under Section 139(1). The purpose of the Capital Gains Account Scheme is to preserve the exemption when actual investment is pending, not to deny it if actual utilization occurs within the statutory timeframe.

Commissioner of Income-tax v. MAC Public Charitable Trust
144 Taxmann.com 54 · 2022 · High Court
55
citing judgments

Additions to income based on statements recorded under Section 132(4) during a search operation are valid, even if later retracted, provided the additions are supported by corroborative seized material and other evidence establishing unaccounted income or transactions.

CIT v. Sardarmal Kothari
302 ITR 286 · 2008 · High Court
53
citing judgments

For claiming capital gains exemption under sections 54 and 54F, it is not mandatory for the assessee to complete the construction of a residential house or obtain an occupancy certificate within the specified period, provided the capital gains are invested in the purchase or construction.

Smitaben N. Ambani v. CWT
323 ITR 104 · 2010 · High Court
44
citing judgments

The annual value of a self-occupied property, for both wealth tax and income tax purposes, is the reasonable rent expected from a hypothetical tenant. When using municipal ratable value, statutory deductions permissible under municipal law must be added back to arrive at this expected rent.

Humayun Suleman Merchant v. CCIT
387 ITR 421 · 2016 · High Court
41
citing judgments

An assessee is not entitled to the full deduction under section 54F if the capital gains were not utilized for the construction of a new house or deposited in the specified bank accounts before filing the return of income. In such cases, the exemption is restricted proportionately to the amount invested.

Taxman 54 (Bom.), KMC Construction Ltd 51 SOT 214 (Hyd), Koya & Co. Construction (P.) Ltd. v. Asstt. CIT
21 Taxmann.com 35 · 2012 · ITAT
38
citing judgments

An assessee is eligible for deduction under section 80IA(4) if they are engaged in the construction of an infrastructure facility, irrespective of whether the activity is considered a works contract or a transfer of property in chattel. The nature of the activity, particularly regarding infrastructure development, determines eligibility.

Judgments citing Section 54(4)