← All Phrases

“Section 67(2)”

Section References (mined)Section 67Section 67(2)4 judgments

The decision most relied on for Section 67(2) is DCIT v. Rajeev G. Kalathil (67 SOT 52), cited in 101 judgments on BharatTax.

Leading authorities on Section 67(2)

DCIT v. Rajeev G. Kalathil
67 SOT 52 · 2015 · ITAT
101
citing judgments

Where purchases are accepted as genuine and a deduction allowed, the corresponding liability cannot be added under Section 68. The case also provides authority on the application of Section 69C when suppliers are non-genuine but the purchases themselves are not doubted.

CIT v. Smt. Sumitra Devi
102 DTR 342 · 2014 · High Court
53
citing judgments

To disallow long-term capital gains, the Assessing Officer must rely on cogent proof, not mere suspicion or presumption, regarding share price manipulation or the nature of the companies involved.

Saxo India (P) Ltd. v. ACIT
67 Taxmann.com 155 · 2016 · Reported
41
citing judgments

M/s E Zest Solutions Ltd. is a good comparable company and should be retained for transfer pricing benchmarking purposes.

Sonakshi Sinha v. CIT
142 Taxmann.com 414 · 2022 · ITAT
37
citing judgments

The requirement to file Form 67 by the due date for claiming foreign tax credit is directory, not mandatory, if filed before the completion of assessment proceedings.

A.V. Thomas and Co. Ltd. v. CIT
48 ITR 67 · 1963 · Supreme Court
27
citing judgments

For a bad debt to be allowable as a deduction, it must be a debt that, if good, would have increased the taxable profits. An expenditure for running a school for employees' children in a remote area can be considered an allowable expenditure for the welfare of employees.

Chief CIT (Admn.) v. Machine Tool Corpn. of India Ltd.
192 ITR 700 · 1991 · High Court
22
citing judgments

A revised return obliterates the earlier return filed by the assessee. The assessment must be completed considering only the revised return.

Vinodkumar Lakshmipathi v. CIT (Appeals) NFAC
145 Taxmann.com 235 · 2022 · ITAT
21
citing judgments

The ITAT held that failure to file Form 67 by the due date for filing the return of income is not fatal to the claim for foreign tax credit. The appellate authority can condone the delay in filing Form 67.

Trib.) (para 7), Sonakshi Sinha v. CIT (Appeals)
197 ITD 263 · 2022 · ITAT
15
citing judgments

The time limit for filing Form 67 to claim foreign tax credit is directory, not mandatory. If no negative consequences are contemplated for non-adherence, the provision is considered directory.

Judgments citing Section 67(2)