← All Phrases

“Section 33(6)”

Section References (mined)Section 33Section 33(6)4 judgments

The decision most relied on for Section 33(6) is Commissioner of Income Tax Madras v. Chenniyappa Mudiliar (1 SCC 591), cited in 225 judgments on BharatTax.

Leading authorities on Section 33(6)

Commissioner of Income Tax Madras v. Chenniyappa Mudiliar
1 SCC 591 · 1985 · Reported
225
citing judgments

The appellate tribunal must render a proper decision on both facts and law, disposing of an appeal on its merits rather than dismissing it solely due to the appellant's absence. This obligation is derived from Section 33(4) of the Income Tax Act, 1922, and reflects principles of natural justice.

275(Delhi); Pr. CIT v. West Bengal Infrastructure Development Finance Corpn Ltd.
143 Taxmann.com 135 · 2022 · High Court
25
citing judgments

Where an expense is incurred for the purpose of acquiring a capital asset, and that asset is subsequently sold, the expenditure must be considered as part of the cost of acquisition of that asset for the purpose of calculating capital gains. This is because the expense forms an integral part of the cost of acquiring the asset, not an expenditure of revenue nature.

DCIT v. Toyo Engineering India ltd.
33 Taxmann.com 560 · 2013 · Reported
22
citing judgments

Depreciation is not allowed on goodwill if it arises from book entries and has no identifiable cost of acquisition. This applies even when goodwill is acquired as part of a scheme of arrangement or amalgamation.

SC) 33 ITR 182 4. Jagarnath vs. CIT 2 ITC 4, CIT vs. Nawaz 6 ITR 370; Gajalakshmi v. CIT
99 ITR 236 · 1975 · High Court
13
citing judgments

This case is authority for the proposition that where income has escaped assessment due to the assessee's failure to disclose material facts, reassessment proceedings under Section 147 are valid.

Indian Farmers Fertilizers Co-operative Ltd. v. Jt. CIT
105 ITD 33 · 2007 · ITAT
12
citing judgments

An assessee can challenge reassessment proceedings as being without jurisdiction in collateral proceedings for rectification under section 154, even if they have not appealed the reassessment order.

69C. SLN Coffee Curing Works, Kushalnagar Page 19 of 33 12.S.Rudramuniyappa v. CIT
75 Taxmann.com 241 · 2016 · Supreme Court
11
citing judgments

Additions can be made based on seized documents if the assessee fails to justify their stand regarding unaccounted sales or the nature of expenditure.

Judgments citing Section 33(6)