← All Phrases

“Section 33(6)”

Section References (mined)Section 33Section 33(6)4 judgments

R.H. AGRO OVERSEAS (P) LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-21(2), NEW DELHI

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed being devoid of any merit and bereft of any reasoning

ITA 1151/DEL/2021[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 Jun 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Ms. Madhumita Roy & Shri Khettra Mohan Royr.H. Agro Overseas (P) Vs. Acit, Circle -21(2) Limited, A-7, 1St Floor, R. No. 222, C.R Bldg. South Exntension, New Delhi – 110002 Part-H, New Delhi – 110049 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No: Aadcr1069G Appellant .. Respondent Acit, Circle-20(2) Vs. M/S R.H. Agro Overseas New Delhi Pvt.Ltd. A-7, 1St Floor, South Extn. Part-Ii New Delhi- 110049 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No: Aadcr1069G Appellant .. Respondent

For Appellant: Sh. Raj Kumar Gupta, CAFor Respondent: Ms. Monika Singh, CIT, DR
Section 143(3)Section 145

P a g e | 1 ITA No\. 1151/Del/2021 & R.H.Agro Overseas Pvt. Ltd. (AYs. 2013-14 & 2014-15) THE INCOME TAX

ACIT, CIRCLE-20(2), NEW DELHI vs. R.H. AGRO OVERSEAS (P) LTD., NEW DELHI

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed being devoid of any merit and bereft of any reasoning

ITA 4964/DEL/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 Jun 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Ms. Madhumita Roy & Shri Khettra Mohan Royr.H. Agro Overseas (P) Vs. Acit, Circle -21(2) Limited, A-7, 1St Floor, R. No. 222, C.R Bldg. South Exntension, New Delhi – 110002 Part-H, New Delhi – 110049 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No: Aadcr1069G Appellant .. Respondent Acit, Circle-20(2) Vs. M/S R.H. Agro Overseas New Delhi Pvt.Ltd. A-7, 1St Floor, South Extn. Part-Ii New Delhi- 110049 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No: Aadcr1069G Appellant .. Respondent

For Appellant: Sh. Raj Kumar Gupta, CAFor Respondent: Ms. Monika Singh, CIT, DR
Section 143(3)Section 145

P a g e | 1 ITA No\. 1151/Del/2021 & R.H.Agro Overseas Pvt. Ltd. (AYs. 2013-14 & 2014-15) THE INCOME TAX

RAM UJAGIR RAM SABDA PANDEY,MUMBAI vs. CIRCLE 20(3) (1), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed with the above directions

ITA 2254/MUM/2021[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai19 Sept 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Kuldip Singh & Shri Gagan Goyal

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. Ashish Kumar, Sr. DR
Section 133(6)Section 147Section 148Section 33(6)Section 69CSection 69c

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH “SMC”, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI KULDIP SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI GAGAN GOYAL

PUSHPABEN CHANDULAL SHAH,MUMBAI vs. CIT (A) NFAC, MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed with the above directions

ITA 2096/MUM/2021[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai16 Sept 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Kuldip Singh & Shri Gagan Goyalpushpaben Chandulal Shah, D-3, Siddhapura Industrial Estate, L.B.S Marg, Ghatkopar (W), Mumbai-400086. Pan: Aapps2890B ...... Appellant Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Mumbai. ..... Respondent Appellant By : Sh. Rajesh Shah & Sh. Nimish Shah Respondent By : Sh. Ashish Kumar, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing : 04/07/2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 16/09/2022 Order Per Gagan Goyal, A.M:

For Appellant: Sh. Rajesh Shah & Sh. Nimish ShahFor Respondent: Sh. Ashish Kumar, Sr. DR
Section 133(6)Section 143(1)Section 148Section 250Section 33(6)

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH “SMC”, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI KULDIP SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI GAGAN GOYAL

Section 33(6) — 4 judgments | BharatTax | BharatTax