← All Phrases

“Section 91(1)”

Section References (mined)Section 91Section 91(1)15 judgments

The decision most relied on for Section 91(1) is Pullangode Rubber Produce Co. Ltd. v. State of Kerala (91 ITR 18), cited in 666 judgments on BharatTax.

Leading authorities on Section 91(1)

Pullangode Rubber Produce Co. Ltd. v. State of Kerala
91 ITR 18 · 1973 · Supreme Court
666
citing judgments

Admissions, whether made through entries in account books or statements, are important pieces of evidence but are not conclusive. An assessee has the right to demonstrate that an admission made by them is incorrect or can be retracted.

CIT v. Calcutta Discount Co. Ltd.
91 ITR 8 · 1973 · Supreme Court
236
citing judgments

Income cannot be assessed on purely notional figures or mere suspicion; it must be based on actual evidence and supporting material demonstrating its accrual or receipt by the assessee. Assessments made without such evidence are bad-in-law.

PCIT v. State Bank of Patiala
391 ITR 218 · 2017 · High Court
228
citing judgments

Income from shares and securities held by banks as stock-in-trade constitutes business income, hence Section 14A disallowance is not attracted. Further, any disallowance under Section 14A cannot exceed the actual amount of exempt income earned by the assessee during the year.

CIT v. Dhanrajgirji Raja Narasingirji
91 ITR 544 · 1973 · Supreme Court
154
citing judgments

The revenue cannot question the commercial expediency or wisdom of an expenditure incurred by a businessman, as the businessman is the best judge of their own business interests. The department's role is limited to verifying if the expenditure was genuinely incurred and was wholly and exclusively for business purposes.

Sambhaji and Others v. Gangabai and Others
17 SCC 117 · 2008 · Supreme Court
87
citing judgments

Procedural law serves as an aid to justice, not an obstruction, and should not ordinarily be construed as mandatory; it is subservient to substantive justice.

Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) v. DGIT (Exemptions)
358 ITR 91 · 2013 · High Court
80
citing judgments

An institution carrying out charitable objects, such as education or advancement of general public utility, does not lose its Section 11 exemption merely by collecting fees for activities like campus placements or educational guidance, as this does not constitute carrying on a business.

Madras Industrial Investment Corpn. Ltd. v. CIT
91 Taxmann 340 · 1997 · Supreme Court
73
citing judgments

The Supreme Court held that discount on the issue of debentures is a deductible expenditure that can be spread proportionately over the period for which the debentures remain outstanding, rather than being claimed entirely in the year of issue. This treatment acknowledges the enduring benefit derived from the funds raised through debentures.

Kerala State Electricity Board v. DCIT
329 ITR 91 · 2010 · High Court
69
citing judgments

Section 43B does not apply to electricity duty collected by an assessee under the Electricity Duty Act, as such amounts are not 'sums payable by the assessee by way of tax or duty'. The decision also clarifies the applicability and calculation of book profits under Section 115JB.

Judgments citing Section 91(1)

Lovelock & Lewes Chartered Accountants LLP, Kolkata vs. ITO, Ward - 22(2), Kolkata

The appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn as indicated above

ITA 2172/KOL/2024[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata17 Apr 2025AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Sanjay Awasthii.T.A. No.2172/Kol/2024 Assessment Year: 2005-06 Lovelock & Lewes Chartered Accountants Llp.....………………....Appellant Plot No.56&57, Block Dn, Sector V Salt Lake, Parganas North, Kolkata – 700091. [Pan: Aadcc 3457F] Vs. Ito, Ward-22(2), Kolkata ………..........................................…..…..... Respondent Appearances By: Shri Pulkit Chhajer, Ar, Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Shri Altaf Hossain, Addl. Cit, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : April 16, 2025 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : April 17, 2025 आदेश / Order Per Sonjoy Sarma: The Present Appeal Has Been Preferred By The Assessee Against The Order Dated 29.08.2024 Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre [Hereinafter Referred To As ‘Cit(A)’] Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act (Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Act’). 2. At The Time Of Hearing, The Ld. Ar Submitted That The Assessee Has Opted To File A Declaration Under Direct Tax Vivad Se Viswas (Dtvsv) Scheme, 2024 In Form No.1 On 29.01.2025 Before The Competent Authority U/S 91(1) & Is Awaiting For The Certificate In Form No.2 From The Competent Authority. Accordingly, It Is Prayed Before The Bench That The Present Appeal May Be Allowed To Be Withdrawn With A Liberty To Revive The Same In The Event That The Declaration Made Under The Aforesaid Scheme Is Rejected, Withdrawn, Cancelled Or Not Accepted By The Competent Authority For Any Reason Whatsoever.

Section 250Section 91(1)

आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, कोलकाता पीठ, कोलकाता IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C” BENCH KOLKATA Before Shri Sonjoy