← All Phrases

“Section 193(1)”

Section References (mined)Section 193Section 193(1)4 judgments

M/S NANDLAL KESHARDEO,RANCHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE (1), RANCHI

In the result, this appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 15/RAN/2025[2016-2017]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi12 Nov 2025AY 2016-2017

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

Section 132(1)Section 132(4)Section 153ASection 271(1)(c)Section 271ASection 274

given under section 22(1)/22(2)/34 of the India Income Tax Act, 1922 or which you were required to furnish under section 193(1) or by a notice given under section 193(2)/148 of the Income Tax Act 1961. No…………. Dated... or have without reasonable cause failed

INDIAN FELLOWSHIP OF FORMER SCOUTS AND GUIDES,MAHATMA GANDHI MARG vs. ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, CPC, WARD EXEMPTION

Appeal is allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 4632/DEL/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 Jan 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godaraassessment Year: 2016-17 Indian Fellowship Of Former Vs. Assistant Director Of Income Scouts & Guides, Tax, Cpc, Ward- 16 Mahatma Gandhi Marg, Exemption, Post Bag No.7003 Ip Estate, Delhi New Delhi Pan :Aaati0204L (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By Sh. Prakul Khurana, Adv. & Sh. Mukesh Soni, Adv. Department By Sh. Sanjay Kumar, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 06.01.2025 Date Of Pronouncement 06.01.2025 Order

Section 11Section 12ASection 143(1)Section 154Section 193(1)

incumbent for the assessee to file its Form 10B tax audit report 2 | P a g e within the “due” date of filing section 193(1) return; and, therefore, it is not entitled for section 11 exemption as disallowed in the CPC’s processing herein. 6. It is in this

KAMAL JAFFERALI WADHWANIA,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WD 2(2) (4) , MUMBAI

ITA 391/MUM/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai25 Aug 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Kuldip Singh & Shri Gagan Goyal

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Tejinder Pal Singh, Sr. A.R
Section 193(1)Section 194Section 194CSection 201Section 201(1)

held the assessee in default to pay tax under section 201(1) of the Act for not deducting and depositing of TDS under section 193(1) of the Act on the amount of Rs.5,68,076/- and interest under section 201(1A) of the Act and thereby raised the demand

KAMAL JAFFERALI WADHWANIA,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAS OFFICER , WD 2(2) (4) , MUMBAI

ITA 390/MUM/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai25 Aug 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Kuldip Singh & Shri Gagan Goyal

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Tejinder Pal Singh, Sr. A.R
Section 193(1)Section 194Section 194CSection 201Section 201(1)

held the assessee in default to pay tax under section 201(1) of the Act for not deducting and depositing of TDS under section 193(1) of the Act on the amount of Rs.5,68,076/- and interest under section 201(1A) of the Act and thereby raised the demand