ITAT Guwahati Judgments — May 2025

13 orders · Page 1 of 1

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI
ITA 116/GTY/2024[2019-20]Status: Disposed29 May 2025AY 2019-20
GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI
ITA 110/GTY/2024[2014-15]Status: Disposed29 May 2025AY 2014-15
GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI
ITA 111/GTY/2024[2016-17]Status: Disposed29 May 2025AY 2016-17
GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI
ITA 113/GTY/2024[2017-18]Status: Disposed29 May 2025AY 2017-18
GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI
ITA 114/GTY/2024[2017-18]Status: Disposed29 May 2025AY 2017-18
GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI
ITA 115/GTY/2024[2018-19]Status: Disposed29 May 2025AY 2018-19
GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI
ITA 117/GTY/2024[2020-21]Status: Disposed29 May 2025AY 2020-21
GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI
ITA 118/GTY/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed29 May 2025AY 2021-22
JOSEPH SYNGKLI,NONGPOH vs INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, SHILLONG
ITA 157/GTY/2024[2017-18]Status: Disposed29 May 2025AY 2017-18Remanded

The Tribunal set aside the order of the Ld. CIT(A) and restored the appeal to him for fresh adjudication. This was to provide the assessee an adequate opportunity to explain his claim of exemption under Section 10(26) of the Act before the CIT(A) and the AO. All grounds of appeal were allowed for statistical purposes.

TRENISTONE D SANGMA,AMPATI vs INCOME TAX OFFICER,, WARD - GOALPARA
ITA 285/GTY/2024[2016-17]Status: Disposed29 May 2025AY 2016-17Remanded

The Tribunal noted that the CIT(A) did not admit the appeal for non-payment of advance tax as per section 149(4)(b) and that the AO completed assessment under section 144 due to the assessee's non-participation. Observing that the assessee belongs to a Scheduled Tribe in Meghalaya and her income might be exempt under section 10(26), the Tribunal, with no objection from the DR, set aside the orders of the AO and CIT(A). The case was remanded to the AO to grant the assessee a fresh opportunity to substantiate her claims for exemption under section 10(26).

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI
ITA 112/GTY/2024[2015-16]Status: Disposed29 May 2025AY 2015-16
S.B. BHATTACHARJEE MEMORIAL TRUST FOR CHILDREN EDUCATION ,DIGBOI vs ACIT, CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH, DIBRUGARH
ITA 245/GTY/2024[2022-23]Status: Disposed9 May 2025AY 2022-23Allowed

The Tribunal observed that Form 10B was filed on 01/10/2022 and the return on 07/11/2022, with the audit report uploaded on 01/10/2022, acknowledging a technical delay. Relying on precedents like Sarvodaya Charitable Trust (Gujarat High Court), the Tribunal held that the requirement to file Form 10B is directory and not mandatory, and substantial compliance is sufficient. The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing Form 10B and directed the Assessing Officer to allow the exemption claimed under section 11 of the Act.

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI vs SM JDB ESTATE PRIVATE LIMITED, GUWAHATI, ASSAM
ITA 233/GTY/2024[2018-19]Status: Disposed2 May 2025AY 2018-19