ASIAN COLOUR COATED ISPAT LTD.,GURGAON vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- II, FARIDABAD
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that due to the moratorium under the IBC, the appeal could not be pursued. The provisions of the IBC were considered overriding, and continuing the proceedings would serve no useful purpose.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal was filed against an assessment order. Proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) were ongoing against the assessee, and a moratorium had been granted by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT).
What were the issues?
Whether an appeal before the ITAT can be continued when a moratorium is in effect under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, and whether the IBC provisions override the Income Tax Act in such circumstances.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Pr. CIT v. Monnet Ispat & Energy Ltd.34 citing107 Taxmann.com 481 · 2019 · SC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “A” DELHI
Before: SHRI CHALLA NAGENDRA PRASAD & SHRI PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA
The captioned appeal has been filed by the Assessee against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-II, Gurgaon (‘CIT(A)’ in short) both dated 27.04.2018 arising from the assessment order dated 31.03.2015 passed by the Assessing Officer under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) concerning AY 2012-13.
When the matter was called for hearing, the ld. Counsel for the assessee pointed out that proceedings under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) are going on against the assessee before National Company Law Tribunal Allahabad and moratorium as per the provisions of Section 14 of the IBC has been granted. A copy of the order of NCLT granting moratorium dated 19.10.2020 pursuant to proceedings initiated under IBC Code 2016 was placed on record. It was further pointed out that as per the order of the NCLT, moratorium under Section 14 of IBC 2016 shall have effect from 09.08.2017 till the completion of CIRP or until approval of resolution plan by adjudicating authority under Section 31(1) of IBC or until order of liquidation of the assessee company under Section 33 of IBC as a case may be. It has been further ordered that pending suits or proceedings against the assessee company including execution of any judgment, decree or order in any Court of law, Tribunal, arbitration penal or other authority, etc. is prohibited. It was thus urged that the appeals of the assessee be kept in abeyance or in the alternative where the Tribunal disposes these appeals a liberty be granted to assessee to seek revival of these appeals after lifting of moratorium.
The Ld. Sr.DR also endorsed the averments made in the e-mail of the assessee and submitted that an application for liquidation has been filed before the National Company Law Tribunal, New Delhi Bench by the Financial creditor namely State Bank of India. The application moved by SBI under section 7 of the code seeking initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) which has been admitted and the Delhi Bench of NCLT by its order dated 06.04.2021 have declared moratorium in terms of section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 as per para 34 of its order.
The Ld. Sr.DR accordingly submitted that the present appeal in such circumstances cannot be pursued in view of the overriding provisions of insolvency code but however, prayed for liberty to revive the captioned appeal as and when the moratorium period is over or revival of company takes place.
In the light of statutory provision and in the light of decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Pr. CIT Vs. Monnet Ispat and Energy Limited (2019) 107 taxmann.com 481 and also in the light of the overriding provision of the code in terms of Section 238 of the Act, the assessee is estopped to pursue the captioned appeal.
Thus, in view of the moratorium declared by NCLT, all proceedings in the court of law, Tribunal etc. cannot continue in the light of Section 178(6) of the Act. That being the position, no useful purpose is going to be served in continuing the present proceedings. Therefore, this appeal needs to be consigned to the records.
For such reasons, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed with a liberty to the assessee to seek remedial measures in accordance with law as and when the moratorium period is over or order of the NCLT is modified or revival of the assessee company takes place or where it is necessary to do so in the interest of the parties.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed in limine for statistical purposes. Order was pronounced in the open Court on 28.03.2023.
More judgments on Section 14
- Infra Developers, Shivpuri vs Income Tax Officer, AshoknagarITA 454/AGR/2026[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Shri Jayantibhai Virjibhai Babariya, SuratWTA 2/SRT/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
- Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Shri Jayantibhai Virjibhai Babariya, SuratWTA 1/SRT/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2014-15
- Narayan Industries Global Limited, New Delhi vs DCIT Circle 16(1), DelhiITA 8422/DEL/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed24 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
- Manpreet Estates LLP, Mumbai vs ACIT, Central Circle 8(3), MumbaiITA 4386/MUM/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed11 Sept 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Rentex Polymers Private Limited vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxDelhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Shila Traders vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Ashish Enterprises vs. Assistant Commissioner Gsto Ward No. 86Delhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bhanwal Trading And Company vs. The Union Of INDIARajasthan · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Saraswati Enterprises vs. State Of RajasthanRajasthan · 28 Oct 2026