VIKASH CHAUDHARY,GHAZIABAD vs. ITO WARD - 2(5), NOIDA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the assessee had indeed paid the requisite fees for filing the appeal, making the CIT(A)'s observation erroneous. The Tribunal restored the appeal to the CIT(A) for a fresh decision on merits.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal before the CIT(A) against an assessment order that included long-term capital gains and additions under Section 69. The CIT(A) dismissed the appeal solely on the grounds of non-compliance with Section 249(1)(a) regarding appeal fees.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) erred in dismissing the appeal on the technical ground of non-payment of fees without verifying the facts, and whether the reassessment proceedings were valid.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 69,Section 147,Section 144,Section 249(1)(a)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, [ DELHI BENCH : “H” NEW DELHI ]
Before: ANIL KUMAR CHATURVEDI & SH. YOGESH KUMAR U.S.
PER YOGESH KUMAR U.S., JM
This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order dated 30/08/2018
of the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-1 (hereinafter referred to CIT
(Appeals) New Delhi, for assessment year 2010-11. 2
The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal:-
“1. That on the facts in the circumstance of the case and law, the very initiation under section 148 is beyond the juri iction of Ld. AO which makes the entire reassessment proceeding illegal and void- ab-initio.
That on the facts in the circumstance of the case and law, the impugned order of Ld. CIT(A) is illegal
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 69
- Azure Knowledge Corporation Private… vs The Dy.CIT, Circle-1(1)(1), AhmedabadITA 2013/AHD/2024[2018-19]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Naresh Chandra Khattar, Agra vs ITO Ward-1(1)(2), AgraITA 475/AGR/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Ranchhodbhai Kurjibhai Kakadiya, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1)(1), RajkotITA 553/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Gorantla Rahul Kumar, Visakhapatnam vs The Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 670/VIZ/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Gorantla Rahul Kumar, Visakhapatnam vs The Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 669/VIZ/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Utkal Highways, Bidanasi vs. Union Of INDIAOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pradeep Kumar Behera vs. Superintendent CGST And Central Excise., CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Manas Behera vs. Commissioner, CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pramod Kumar Nayak vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, KendraparaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Nirmal Kumar Sharma S/O Ram Swroop Sharma vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 16 Oct 2026