SHREEJEE APTEX P.LTD,NEW DELHI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, NEW DELHI

PDF
ITA 707/DEL/2022Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 March 2023AY 2010-115 pages

No AI summary yet for this case.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH: ‘SMC’ NEW DELHI

Before: SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY

For Appellant: Shri Sachin Jain, CA
For Respondent: Shri D.K. Shrivastav, Sr. DR
Hearing: 27.03.2023Pronounced: 31.03.2023

per the status available in Ministry of Corporate Affair’s record. He

submitted, the assessee had allotted shares to the concerned entities.

Thus, he submitted, a direction may be issued to the Assessing Officer

to conduct necessary inquiry with the concerned entities.

6.

Learned Departmental Representative submitted, issue can be

restored back to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication.

7.

I have considered rival submissions and perused the material

available on record.

8.

Undisputedly, the assessee had received aggregate amount of

Rs.23,79,000 towards investment in share capital from M/s. Nepostel

India Pvt. Ltd. and M/s. Chinu Press & Prakash Pvt. Ltd. It is

4 ITA No.707/Del./2022

observed from Form 23 filed by the assessee before the Registrar of

Companies (ROC), the assessee had issued shares to M/s. Nepostel

India Pvt. Ltd. and M/s. Chinu Press & Prakash Pvt. Ltd. during the

financial year 2010-11. Further, from the MCA data filed in the paper

books, it is observed that the status of these companies have been

shown as active as on 31.03.2022, the balance sheet date. It is further

observed, in course of assessment proceedings itself, the assessee had

requested the Assessing Officer to issue summons under Section 131

of the Act to the parties as they were not cooperating with the

assessee. It appears, the Assessing Officer has neither acceded to the

request of the assessee nor has himself conducted, even, preliminary

inquiry by issuing notice under Section 133(6) of the Act. Merely

because, the assessee was unable to produce the bank statements of

M/s. Nepostel India Pvt. Ltd. and M/s. Chinu Press & Prakash Pvt.

Ltd., for that reasoning alone, the share capital cannot be added under

Section 68 of the Act. Since, the departmental authorities, particularly,

the Assessing Officer have failed to carry out the necessary inquiry, I

deem it appropriate to restore the issue to the Assessing Officer for

fresh examination after conducting necessary inquiry with M/s.

5 ITA No.707/Del./2022

Nepostel India Pvt. Ltd. and M/s. Chinu Press & Prakash Pvt. Ltd.

with regard to the investments made in share capital.

9.

Needless to mention, before deciding the issue the Assessing

Officer must afford reasonable opportunity of being heard to the

assessee.

10.

Grounds are allowed for statistical purposes.

11.

In the result, the appeal is allowed for statistical purposes.

Order pronounced in the open court on31st March, 2023.

Sd/- (SAKTIJIT DEY) JUDICIAL MEMBER Dated: 31st March, 2023. Mohan Lal