NIRMAL GUPTA,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-25(2), NEW DELHI
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that since the original proceedings under Section 263 were quashed, the consequential order of the CIT(A) did not survive. Therefore, the appeal was decided in favor of the assessee.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal was consequential to an order passed under Section 263 by the CIT(A). The assessee had previously appealed to the Tribunal, which quashed the proceedings under Section 263.
What were the issues?
Whether a consequential order of the CIT(A) survives when the original order it was based upon is quashed by a higher appellate authority.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH, ‘E’: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI SHAMIM YAHYA & Ms. ASTHA CHANDRA
ORDER PER SHAMIM YAHYA, AM,
This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of ld. CIT (Appeals)-36, New Delhi, dated 18.10.2019 and pertains to Assessment Year 2015-16.
At the outset, in this case, the ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that this appeal is consequential to the order passed u/s 263 by the Ld. CIT(A). The assessee had filed appeal before the Tribunal in and the Tribunal vide order dated 22.06.2021 has quashed the proceedings u/s 263 of the Act. In this view of the matter, the ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that the consequential order did not survive.
The Ld. DR could not be disputed the above proposition.
Accordingly, the order of the Ld. CIT(A) is liable to be set-aside and the issue decide in favour of the assessee and the same is accordingly done.
In the result, this appeal of the assessee stands allowed.
Order pronounced in the open court on 05th April, 2023.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Santa Singh vs. SuperintendentUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Azaad Builders vs. Assistant Commissioner SGSTUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Shadab Malik vs. State Of U.P. And 2 OthersAllahabad · 26 Oct 2026
- Ganesh Trimbak Saraf And Another vs. The State Of Maharashtra And AnotherBombay · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vajram Infra Material Industries vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026