SHRI ASHWANI MALHOTRA,AMRITSAR vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -1, AMRITSAR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal allowed the assessee to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as infructuous because the assessment order passed by the AO NFAC, Delhi had accepted the assessee's contentions.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order of the Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax. The assessee later requested to withdraw the appeal due to unavoidable reasons.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee's appeal should be withdrawn. The appeal became infructuous as the underlying assessment was favorably decided for the assessee.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AMRITSAR BENCH, AMRITSAR
Before: DR. M. L. MEENA & SH. ANIKESH BANERJEE
This appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order of the Ld. Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Amritsar dated 16.03.2022 in respect of Assessment Year: 2017-18.
Ashwani Malhotra v. Pr. CIT 2. At the outset, the ld. counsel for the assessee has submitted vide application dated Nil that the AO NFAC, Delhi while framing the assessment in pursuance of the order passed u/s 263 has accepted the contentions of the assessee, vide assessment order dated 31.03.2023.
Therefore, he requested that the appeal of the assessee may be allowed to be withdrawn, by contending in the aforesaid application as under:
“With reference to above, it is most respectfully submitted that due to certain unavoidable reasons, I want to withdraw my Appeal No. 73/Asr/2022 in the above said case. Your good self is requested to kindly allow me to for the same. I shall be highly thankful to your good self for this act of kindness. I feel sorry for any inconvenience caused to your Honorable court.”
The Ld. D.R. has no objection to the request of the assessee for withdrawal of the appeal.
Accordingly, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as infructuous.
Order pronounced in the open court on 13.04.2023
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- U Days Garments vs. The Adjudication OfficerMadras · 16 Oct 2026
- M/S Jsw Cement Limited,Jajpur vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sreeshobi Enterprises vs. The Appellate AuthorityMadras · 16 Oct 2026
- S.T.Promotors vs. The Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 16 Oct 2026
- Prashanti Das (M/S. Panchamukhi Enterprises) vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Jagatsinghpur CircleOrissa · 16 Oct 2026