KRYPTON PROGRESSIVE EDUCATIONAL & HEALTH CARE TRUST,MORADABAD vs. CIT(E), LUCKNOW
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and restored the issue to the file of the CIT(E). The assessee was granted an opportunity to appear and explain the expenses incurred for charitable purposes.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Krypton Progressive Educational & Health Care Trust, appealed against the dismissal of its application for registration under Section 12A(a). The CIT(E) had dismissed the application citing lack of expenditure on charitable objects, with only advertisement and salary expenses incurred.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(E) was justified in dismissing the application for registration without giving the assessee a proper opportunity to explain its expenditures on charitable objects.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘C’ : NEW DELHI
Before: SH. G.S.PANNU, HON’BLE & SH. ANUBHAV SHARMA
Heard and perused the record.
None has appeared for the assessee. Notices have been issued repeatedly for hearing and on last three occasions also none has appeared. Accordingly, arguments of Ld. DR were heard, who supported the findings of ld. Tax Authorities below.
The assessee is in appeal against order dated 21.12.2020 whereby the ld. CIT(E), Lukhnow has dismissed the application for registration u/s 12A(a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
170.Del.2021
The impugned order reflects that apart from expenditure on advertisement and salaries there was no expenditure on the charitable objects in the last three years. The statement of facts filed on behalf of the appellant mentions that on 12.08.2020 in view of Covid-19 situation, adjournment was allowed once and thereafter the adjournment was declined. It is stated therein the statement of facts, as to how income is generated by way of tuition fee, admission fee and transportation fee and the construction work was going on upon which the expenses were incurred.
In the light of aforesaid, the ends of justice require giving assessee an opportunity to appear before the Ld. CIT(E), Luckhnow and make the submissions explaining that the expenses have been incurred for charitable purposes / objects. The impugned order dated 21.12.2020 is set aside for statistical purposes. The appeal is allowed for statistical purposes and the issue is restored to the files of ld. CIT(E).
Order pronounced in the open court on 25th April, 2023.
More judgments on Section 12A(a)
- Ramkrishna Bajaj Charitable Trust, Mumbai vs Deputy Commissioner of Income-Tax, Circle…ITA 66/MUM/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
- Thiaga Sastha Trust, Chennai vs CIT(Exemption), ChennaiITA 3391/CHNY/2025[-]Status: Disposed4 May 2026
- Vatva Industries Association Charitable… vs I.T.O. Ward 2 Exemption, AhmedabadITA 760/AHD/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed25 Feb 2026AY 2020-21
- Virudhunagar Hindu Tholan, Virudhunagar vs CIT Exemptions, ChennaiITA 67/CHNY/2025[-]Status: Disposed26 Sept 2025
- Virudhunagar Hindu Tholan, Virudhunagar vs CIT, Exemptions, ChennaiITA 1943/CHNY/2025[-]Status: Disposed26 Sept 2025
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Rohit Medical Systems vs. Commissioner Of Delhi Goods And Services Tax And Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Shivam Kumar vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Rajkalpana Travels PVT. LTD. vs. Commissioner CGST, Delhi North CommissionerateDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Mahaveer Ispat Traders vs. Principal Commissioner Dgst Delhi Department Of Trade And Taxes Gnctd & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026