DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-14, DELHI vs. DELHI GURGAON SUPER CONNECTIVITY PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The ITAT noted that a previous ITAT order had already quashed the revisionary order of the PCIT. Consequently, the Revenue's present appeal became infructuous.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal against an order of the CIT(A) which had allowed the assessee's appeal. The original assessment order was passed under Section 144 read with Section 263 after a revisionary order by the PCIT.
What were the issues?
Whether the Revenue's appeal is maintainable when the underlying revisionary order has been quashed by a higher tribunal.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “B”: NEW DELHI
PER C. M. GARG, J. M.:
This appeal has been preferred by the assessee against the order of the CIT(A)-26, New Delhi, dated 29.06.2022 for AY 2014-15. 2. The ld CIT DR candidly agreed to the submission of the assessee’s representative (AR) that ld PCIT-2, New Delhi vide order dated 29.03.2019 u/s 263 of the Act revised the assessment for AY 2014-15. In pursuant thereto the AO passed assessment order on 22.12.2019 u/s 144 r.w.s 263 of the Act by making addition on account of unexplained sundry creditors and against said assessment order the assessee filed appeal which was allowed by the ld CIT(A) against the said first appellate order the revenue has filed this appeal in hand.
After submitting above factual details, the ld DR submitted copy of the order of ITAT Delhi C Bench order dated 10.10.2020 for AY 2014-15 Delhi Gurgaon Super Connectivity Pvt. Ltd wherein, the Tribunal has quashed the said revisionary order of ld PCIT dated 29.03.2019 and thus, this appeal of Revenue have become infructuous. The ld CIT DR agreed that the after order of Tribunal quashing revisionary order dated 29.03.2019, the present appeal of revenue has became infructuous and thus, we dismiss the same as having became infructuous.
In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed. Order pronounced in the open court on 02/05/2023. - - (M. Balaganesh) JUDICIAL MEMBER Dated: 02/05/2023 A K Keot
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Akshaya Consortium vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Dipanshu Aggarwal vs. Director General Of GST IntelligenceDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Dezinetree Projects PVT. LTD. vs. Spokes Digital Inc And AnrDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Jaydeep Jayantilal Hudaka vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 28 Oct 2026
- Commissioner/Additional Commissioner Of Central Tax vs. M/S INDIA Agro Exports Private LimitedKarnataka · 28 Oct 2026