DCIT CIRCLE-1(1), GURGAON vs. GURCHARNA KUMAR SETHI, GURGAON
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the Revenue's appeal was not maintainable due to the low tax effect, as per the applicable CBDT circular. Consequently, the assessee's cross-objection was dismissed as infructuous.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal before the ITAT. The assessee argued that the tax effect involved in the appeal was below Rs. 50 lakhs, making it non-maintainable as per CBDT Circular No. 17/2019. The Revenue conceded to this point.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the maintainability of the Revenue's appeal before the ITAT based on the monetary limit prescribed by CBDT circulars.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH : B : DELHI
Before: SHRI C.M. GARG & SHRI M. BALAGANESH
ORDER
PER M. BALAGANESH, AM:
The appeal in Cross Objection in CO No.37/Del/2023 for AY 2012-13, arise out of the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, Gurgaon, [hereinafter referred to as ‘ld. CIT(A)’, in short] in Appeal No.624/18-19, A.Y. 2012-13 dated 20.09.2019 against the order of assessment passed u/s 153C r.w.s. 153A r.w.s. 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) dated 22.12.2018 by the Assessing Officer, Circle-1(1), Gurgaon (hereinafter referred to as ‘ld. AO’).
The ld. counsel for the assessee, at the outset, submitted that the tax effect involved in the grounds raised by the Revenue is below Rs.50 lakhs. Therefore, in view of the recent CBDT Circular No.17/2019 dated 8th August, 2019, raising the monetary limit for filing of the appeal by the Revenue before the Tribunal to Rs.50 lakhs and the subsequent clarification of the CBDT, vide Notification dated 20th August, 2019 stating that the said Circular is applicable even to pending appeals, the appeal filed by the Revenue is not maintainable.
The ld. DR, on the other hand, fairly conceded that the tax effect involved in the grounds raised by the Revenue being below Rs.50 lakhs, the appeal filed by the Revenue squarely falls within the ambit of the recent CBDT Circular No.17/2019 dated 8th August, 2019 and the subsequent clarification dated 20th August, 2019.
After hearing both the sides, we find the tax effect involved in the grounds raised by the Revenue is admittedly below Rs.50 lakhs. Therefore, in view of the CO No.37/Del/2023 CBDT Circular No.17/2019 dated 8th August, 2019 raising the monetary limit for filing of the appeals by the Revenue before the Tribunal to Rs.50 lakhs and the subsequent clarification dated 20th August, 2019 to the effect that the said Circular is applicable even to pending appeals, the appeal filed by the Revenue is not maintainable. Accordingly, the same is dismissed.
However, if the Revenue at any point of time finds that the tax effect involved in the grounds of the Revenue is more than Rs.50 lakhs or that the same is falling under the exceptions provided in the said Circular, the Revenue may move necessary application for recall of this order.
CO No.37/Del/2023
In view of the dismissal of the appeal of the Revenue due to low tax effect, the Cross Objection filed by the assessee is hereby dismissed as infructuous.
In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed and the Cross Objection of the assessee is dismissed as infructuous. Order pronounced in the open court on 06.06.2023
More judgments on Section 153C
- Neepaben Sunnybhai Motwani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 875/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Neepaben Sunnybhai Motwani, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 874/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Venish Vinodray Lalani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, MorbiITA 197/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Ajay Singh, Kota vs DCIT, Central Circle, KotaITA 495/JPR/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Dineshkumar Chhaganlal Manavadaria, Junagadh vs ITO Ward 1, JunagadhITA 837/RJT/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Mascot Constructions Co. And Another vs. The Commissioner Of Goods And Services Tax (GST) And AnotherBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Fasil Hussain Shah vs. Ut Of J And K Th Commissioner Secretary TO Government Finance Department And OthersJammu and Kashmir and Ladakh · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S. Devkinandan Traders vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Dixit Medical Agencies vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026