M/S JAI DURGA CEMENT P. LTD.,SAMBA vs. D.C.I.T, CIRCLE -1, JAMMU
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee was not interested in pursuing the appeals and the revenue did not object to their withdrawal. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the withdrawal of the appeals.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed two appeals against the orders of the CIT(A) for assessment years 2008-09 and 2009-10. The assessee later filed an application requesting to withdraw both appeals.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the assessee should be allowed to withdraw their pending appeals before the tribunal.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AMRITSAR BENCH, AMRITSAR
Before: DR. M. L. MEENA & SH. ANIKESH BANERJEE
Per Dr. M. L. Meena, AM:
Both the above appeals have been filed by the Assessee against the orders of the Ld. CIT(A) Jammu even dt. 09/11/2012, in respect of the Assessment Year 2008-09 and 2009-10.
During the course of hearing none appeared on behalf of the assessee but an application was filed for withdrawal of the above appeals, contents of which reads as under:
Sub: Request for withdrawl of two appeals of assessee Respectfully showeth: That the above two appeals filed belatedly by the assessee, impuging the orders of CIT(A) Jammu, are now fixed for hearing before the Hon’ble Bench on 14.06 2023.
That on a reconsideration of the facts and circumstances of the two cases, the assessee is no more interested in purusing the above appeals, which are otherwise out of time. Hence, it is humbly requested that the assessee be kindly allowed to withdraw both the appeals. It is prayed accordingly. Sd/- (J.S. Bhasin) Advocate for ‘a’
Ld. DR did not object if both the appeals of the assessee are dismissed as withdrawn.
In view of the above, both the appeals of the assessee are dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, appeals of the Assessee are dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open court on 16/06/2023
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Laxman Singh Yadav vs. Bank Of BarodaMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Surendra Singh Rathore vs. Idfc First Bank Through Branch ManagerMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026
- Mascot Constructions Co. And Another vs. The Commissioner Of Goods And Services Tax (GST) And AnotherBombay · 22 Oct 2026