M/S RCP INFRATECH PRIVATE LIMITED,RAIPUR (CG) vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX- 3(1), RAIPUR (CG)
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as withdrawn, subject to the condition that if the Vivad se Vishwas scheme does not resolve the matter, the assessee can seek restoration of the appeal.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the CIT(A)'s order. During the pendency of the appeal, the assessee applied under the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020, and received Form 5.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal can be withdrawn due to the assessee opting for the Vivad se Vishwas scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, RAIPUR BENCH, RAIPUR
Before: SHRI RAVISH SOOD & SHRI JAMLAPPA D. BATTULL
ORDER
PER RAVISH SOOD, JM:
The present appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order passed by the CIT(A)-1, Raipur, dated 24.03.2017, which in turn arises from the order passed by the A.O under Sec. 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, dated 16.02.2016 for assessment year 2013-14.
The assessee company has filed a letter dated Nil (received on 18.11.2021), wherein it is stated that in order to settle the aforesaid appeal 2 A.Y.2013-14 pending before the Tribunal an application has been filed under the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020. During the course of hearing of the appeal, it was stated by the Ld. Authorized Representative (in short ‘AR') for the assessee that “Form 5” have been issued by the designated authority. Backed by the aforesaid facts it is requested that the captioned appeal may be allowed to be withdrawn. 3. The ld. D.R did not controvert the aforesaid factual position as had been stated before us. 4. In view of the above we dismiss the appeal as withdrawn, subject to a rider that in the unlikely event of the matter not being resolved under the Vivad se Vishwas scheme, then, the appellant shall have liberty to approach the Tribunal for restoration of its appeal. 5. Resultantly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn subject to the observation recorded hereinabove. Order pronounced in Open Court on 31st day of January, 2022.
Sd/- Sd/- JAMLAPPA D. BATTULL RAVISH SOOD ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER रायपुर/ RAIPUR ; �दनांक / Dated : 31st January, 2022 SB 3 A.Y.2013-14 आदेश क� �ितिलिप अ�ेिषत / Copy of the Order forwarded to :
1. 1. अपीलाथ� / The Appellant. 2. ��यथ� / The Respondent.
3. The CIT(Appeals)-1, Raipur (C.G) 4. The Pr. CIT-1, Raipur, Raipur (C.G) 5. िवभागीय �ितिनिध, आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण,रायपुर ब�च, रायपुर / DR, ITAT, Raipur Bench, Raipur. गाड� फ़ाइल / Guard File. 6. आदेशानुसार / BY ORDER, // True Copy // िनजी सिचव / Private Secretary आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, रायपुर / ITAT, Raipur.
Date 1 Draft dictated on 31.01.2022 Sr.PS/PS 2 Draft placed before author 31.01.2022 Sr.PS/PS 3 Draft proposed and placed JM/AM before the second Member 4 Draft discussed/approved by AM/JM second Member 5 Approved draft comes to the Sr.PS/PS Sr. PS/PS 6 Kept for pronouncement on Sr.PS/PS 7 Date of uploading of order Sr.PS/PS 8 File sent to Bench Clerk Sr.PS/PS 9 Date on which the file goes to the Head Clerk 10 Date on which file goes to the A.R 11 Date of dispatch of order
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ramesh K Devadiga vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co Operative Housing Society LTDBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Ramesh K Devadiga And Ors vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co-Operative Housing Society LTD And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Permender Singh vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Abdhish Dhal Samanta, Bhubaneswar vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Kniit Net Industries Private Limited, Khurda vs. Superintendent Of CGST And Central Excise, Bhubaneswar Ii CircleOrissa · 14 Oct 2026