NITIN MOHANLAL TAORI,KHAMGAON vs. THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -1, NAGPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessees had applied for withdrawal of their appeals and the Revenue had no objection. Therefore, the appeals were dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessees had filed appeals before the ITAT against orders passed by the Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax under Section 263. Subsequently, the assessees filed applications seeking withdrawal of their appeals.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the assessees' appeals should be dismissed as withdrawn based on their applications and the Revenue's no objection.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, BENCH, NAGPUR
Before: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO & SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
आदेश / ORDER PER BENCH : These two appeals preferred by the different assessees emanates from the different orders of the Ld. Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Nagpur dated 12.12.2018 passed u/s.263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) for the assessment year 2014-15 as per the grounds of appeal on record.
The assessees have filed applications received on 18.08.2021 seeking withdrawal of the appeals. The Ld. DR for Revenue has raised no objection on assessee’s withdrawing the appeals. In view of application made by assessee, the appeal is dismissed as having been 'withdrawn'.
In the result, appeals of the assessees are dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced on 06th day of September, 2021.
Sd/- Sd/- INTURI RAMA RAO PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER पुणे / Pune; ददनांक / Dated : 06th September, 2021 SB आदेश की प्रधतधलधप अग्रेधषत / Copy of the Order forwarded to : अपीलाथी / The Appellant. 1. प्रत्यथी / The Respondent. 2.
3. The Pr. CIT-1 Nagpur.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Vk Construction vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IiMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Sri Bhuvaneshwari And Co vs. The Deputy Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026
- Giri Paints vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026
- Rahul Radheshyam Chauhan vs. Union Of INDIA Thru The Sec. Ministry Of Law And Justice And OrsBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- S.Murugesan vs. The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026