ASTHMA BRONCHITIS AND CANCER FOUNDATION,DELHI vs. CIT EXEMPTION, DELHI

From the perusal of the order, it is seen that the assessee filed Form 10B for granting registration u/s 12AB(1)(b)(ii) of the Act which stood rejected, as the assessee has failed to provide the details as sought for time to time and thus, the Ld. CIT(E) was the opinion that the assessee was not carrying any charitable activities.

None appeared on behalf of the assessee.

Ld. CIT-DR supported the orders of Ld. CIT(E) and submits that assessee received grants of Rs. 1,85,000/- which was spent on administrative expenses Asthma Bronchitis and Cancer Foundation vs. CIT(E) like professional charges, program expenditure etc. and failed to establish that it was carrying out charitable activities. He thus requested for the confirmation of the order of ld. CIT(E) of denial the registration u/s 12A of the Act.

We have heard ld. CIT DR. From the perusal of the order of Ld. CIT(E), it is seen that the Ld. CIT(E) on various occasions asked the assessee to file detailed note on the activity carried out alongwith supporting evidences like bills / vouchers etc. to substantiate the charitable activities claimed to be carried out. However, since the assessee failed to file any such reply/information before the Ld. CIT(E), thus, the CIT(E) has denied the registration u/s 12A(1)(ac)(iii) of the Act.

Under these facts and circumstances of the case and in the interest of natural justice, in our considered opinion one more opportunity is to be given to the assessee to file all the relevant details before the ld. CIT(E) to establish the charitable activities carried out. Accordingly, we set aside the order of ld. CIT(E) and restored the matter back to the file of Ld. CIT(E) for fresh adjudication on merits in accordance with law after providing reasonable opportunities to the assessee. The Assesse is also directed to file the necessary evidences before the Ld. CIT(E) to establish the genuineness and charitable nature of its activities. With these directions appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.

In the result, the appeal filed by the assesse is allowed for statistical purposes.