M. KRISHNA G,NAIDU,SOLAPUR vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD - 2(2), SOLAPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The ITAT held that dismissing an appeal for non-prosecution without considering the merits of the case is contrary to law. The matter was restored to the CIT(A) for a decision on merits.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT against an order of the CIT(A) concerning assessment year 2007-08. The CIT(A) had dismissed the assessee's appeal for non-prosecution.
What were the issues?
Whether an appeal can be dismissed solely for non-prosecution without adjudicating the merits of the case.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” BENCH, PUNE
Before: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO, AM & SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY, JM
आदेश / ORDER PER INTURI RAMA RAO, AM:
This is an appeal filed by the assessee directed against the order of learned Commissioner of Income Tax – (Appeals) – 7, Pune, (hereinafter referred as “ld.CIT”) dated 05.12.2017 passed u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act (hereinafter referred as “the Act”) for the assessment year 2007-08.
When the appeal was called on none appeared on behalf of the assessee.
On perusal of the order of ld.CIT(A), it is clear that the ld.CIT(A) had dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution without going into the merits of the issue in the appeal.
We have heard the ld.D.R. The approach of the ld.CIT(A) is contrary to the settled position of law and that even in the case of non-prosecution, the appeal cannot be dismissed in limine without going into the merits of the case. Therefore, the matter is restored back to the file of ld.CIT(A) to decide the issue in appeal on merits in accordance with the law.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced on 27th day of July, 2021.
More judgments on Section 271(1)(c)
- Ajaybhai Dineshbhai Bagdai, Near Central… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(1), New…ITA 74/RJT/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
- Shalin Jayantbhai Desai, Vadodara vs ACIT, Circle-4(2), Vadodara Present…ITA 2569/AHD/2026[2010-11]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2010-11
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2370/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2369/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Shining Steel Through Its Proprietor Kartik Gupta vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Redamancy World Through Its Proprietor Sanjay Kumar Goel vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Arj Exim INDIA vs. Additional Commissioner Of CGST, Appeals-Ii, New Delhi And OrsDelhi · 27 Oct 2026
- The State Of Bihar Through The Commissioner Of State Tax vs. Kaushlendra KumarPatna · 27 Oct 2026
- Ayush Sureshchandra Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026