M. KRISHNA G,NAIDU,SOLAPUR vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD - 2(2), SOLAPUR

PDF · subscribers
ITA 542/PUN/2018Status: DisposedITAT Pune27 July 2021AY 2007-082 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The ITAT held that dismissing an appeal for non-prosecution without considering the merits of the case is contrary to law. The matter was restored to the CIT(A) for a decision on merits.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT against an order of the CIT(A) concerning assessment year 2007-08. The CIT(A) had dismissed the assessee's appeal for non-prosecution.

What were the issues?

Whether an appeal can be dismissed solely for non-prosecution without adjudicating the merits of the case.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 271(1)(c)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” BENCH, PUNE

Before: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO, AM & SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY, JM

Hearing: 27.07.2021Pronounced: 27.07.2021

आदेश / ORDER PER INTURI RAMA RAO, AM:

1.

This is an appeal filed by the assessee directed against the order of learned Commissioner of Income Tax – (Appeals) – 7, Pune, (hereinafter referred as “ld.CIT”) dated 05.12.2017 passed u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act (hereinafter referred as “the Act”) for the assessment year 2007-08.

2.

When the appeal was called on none appeared on behalf of the assessee.

3.

On perusal of the order of ld.CIT(A), it is clear that the ld.CIT(A) had dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution without going into the merits of the issue in the appeal.

4.

We have heard the ld.D.R. The approach of the ld.CIT(A) is contrary to the settled position of law and that even in the case of non-prosecution, the appeal cannot be dismissed in limine without going into the merits of the case. Therefore, the matter is restored back to the file of ld.CIT(A) to decide the issue in appeal on merits in accordance with the law.

5.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes.

Order pronounced on 27th day of July, 2021.

More judgments on Section 271(1)(c)

All 25,141 judgments and leading authorities on Section 271(1)(c) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →