NARPAT ARJUNRAM MISTRY,PUNE vs. ITO, WARD6(3), PUNE

PDF · subscribers
ITA 2122/PUN/2019Status: DisposedITAT Pune30 August 2021AY 2015-164 pages

In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal allowed the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. The withdrawal was permitted in accordance with the provisions of the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT. Subsequently, the assessee sought permission to withdraw the appeal under the 'Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme'. The assessee had opted for the scheme and completed the necessary formalities.

What were the issues?

Whether the assessee can withdraw their appeal before the ITAT under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. Whether the conditions for withdrawal under the scheme have been met.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 4(3) of The Direct Taxes Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCH “SMC”, PUNE – VIRTUAL COURT

Before: SHRI R.S. SYAL & SHRI S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI

For Appellant: Smt. Sarvesha Baj
For Respondent: Shri S.P Walimbe

Assessee by : Smt. Sarvesha Baj Revenue by : Shri S.P Walimbe Date of hearing 30-08-2021 Date of pronouncement 30-08-2021 आदेश / ORDER

This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order passed by the CIT(A)-4, Pune on 23-10-2019 in relation to the assessment year 2015-16.

2.

Before us, the ld. AR has filed a letter dated 09-08-2021 seeking permission to withdraw the appeal under „Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme‟ under The Direct Taxes Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020. The relevant contents of such letter reads as under : “With reference to the above subject, it is respectfully submitted that the Appellant has opted for the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 („DTVSV Act‟), to settle the dispute pending before your Honours. In this reference, the Appellant had submitted Form 1 and Form 2 in accordance with Rule 3 of the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Rules, 2020 („the Rules‟) on 21st December, 2020. Copy of the Form 1 & 2 is attached herewith as Annexure-1 for your Honour‟s ready reference and record. Further, the Designated Authority issued Form 3 in accordance with Rule 3 of the Rules on 11th January, 2021. Copy of the Form 3 is attached herewith as Annexure-2 for your Honour‟s ready reference and record. In view of the above, and in accordance with Section 4(3) of the DTVSV Act, the Appellant is hereby withdrawing the current appeal filed on 31st December, 2019. The Appellant has already paid the entire demand raised in From-3. The Appellant requests your Honour to kindly grant permission to withdraw the appeal, so that it can proceed under the DTVSV Act and settle the dispute.”

3.

On perusal of the above letter and having no objection from the side of ld. DR, we allow the request of ld. AR to withdraw the appeal.

4.

In the result, the appeal is dismissed as „withdrawn‟. Order pronounced in the Open Court on 30th August, 2021.

Sd/- Sd/- (S.S.VISWANETHRA RAVI) (R.S.SYAL) JUDICIAL MEMBER VICE PRESIDENT पपणे Pune; ददिधांक Dated : 30th August, 2021 GCVSR/SB आदेश की प्रनिनिनप अग्रेनषि/Copy of the Order is forwarded to: अपऩिधर्थी / The Appellant; 1. 2. प्रत्यर्थी / The Respondent; 3. The CIT(A)-4, Pune 4. The Pr.CIT-3, Pune 5. DR „SMC‟, ITAT, Pune गार्ड फाईल / Guard file 6. आदेशधिपसधर/ BY ORDER, // True Copy // Senior Private Secretary आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण ,पुणे / ITAT, Pune

Date 1. Draft dictated on 30-08-2021 Sr.PS 2. Draft placed before author 30-08-2021 Sr.PS 3. Draft proposed & placed JM before the second member 4. Draft discussed/approved JM by Second Member. 5. Approved Draft comes to Sr.PS the Sr.PS/PS 6. Kept for pronouncement on Sr.PS 7. Date of uploading order Sr.PS 8. File sent to the Bench Clerk Sr.PS 9. Date on which file goes to the Head Clerk 10. Date on which file goes to the A.R. 11. Date of dispatch of Order.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →