SHREE GOPAL GAUSHALA COMMITTEE,BHIWANI vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), CHANDIGARH
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessee deserves an opportunity to substantiate its claim for registration. The orders of the CIT(Exemptions) were set aside and the matters were restored for fresh adjudication.
What were the facts?
The assessee applied for registration under sections 12AA and 80G of the Income Tax Act. The CIT(Exemptions) dismissed these applications without affording the assessee a proper opportunity of hearing.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(Exemptions) properly afforded an opportunity of hearing to the assessee before dismissing the applications for registration under sections 12AA and 80G.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH: G: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI CHANDRA MOHAN GARG & DR.B.R.R. KUMAR
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH: G: NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI CHANDRA MOHAN GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND DR.B.R.R. KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & 2968/Del/2022 Shree Gopal Gaushala Committee, The CIT(Exemptions), Chandigarh Shree Gopal Gaushala, Pilani Road 160017 Loharu, Bhiawani 127201, vs. PAN AAOAS 9387 B (Appellant) (Respondent) For Assessee : Shri K Sampath, Adv. Revenue For : Shri H.K Choudhary, CIT(DR) Date of Hearing : 28.06.2023 Date of Pronouncement : 28.06.2023 ORDER PER CHANDRA MOHAN GARG, J.M.
These appeals have been filed against the orders of CIT(Exemptions), Chandigarh dated 16.11.2022 by which the authority dismissed the applications of the appellant seeking registrations u/s. 12AA and 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
The ld. counsel of assessee submitted that the ld. CIT(E) has dismissed applications of assessee without affording due opportunity of hearing ex-parte qua appellant therefore impugned orders may kindly be set aside and the appellant may kindly be allowed opportunity of hearing before ld. CIT(E) as per principles of natural justice.
Replying to the above the ld. CIT(DR) opposed to the submissions of ld. counsel of the assessee and submitted that the authority has granted due opportunity of hearing to the appellant which was not availed therefore the orders may kindly be uphold. On being asked by the bench the ld. CIT(DR), in all fairness, submitted that if it is found just and proper then the Department has not serious objection if the matters are restored to the file of the ld. CIT(E) for afresh adjudication.
More judgments on Section 12AA
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2448/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2447/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Sri Jawahar Education Trust, Chamarajanagar vs The Income Tax Officer Ward 1…ITA 1735/BANG/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed5 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 6(1), MohaliITA 636/CHANDI/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle…ITA 635/CHANDI/2024[2017-18]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Arka Business Solutions vs. Principal Commissioner Of CustomsTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mehra Mac Industries Private Limited vs. The Deputy State Tax OfficerTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- Santosh Das And Anr. vs. Union Of INDIACalcutta · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S Rama Krishna Industries vs. State Of Hp And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 30 Oct 2026
- Smt Usha W/O Shri Tarun vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 29 Oct 2026