Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘A’: NEW DELHI
ORDER PER M. BALAGANESH AM: This appeal of the Assessee arises out of the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-19, New Delhi,
[hereinafter referred to as ‘Ld. CIT(A)’] in Appeal No.10436/17-18 dated 07/12/2018 against the order passed by Income Tax Officer,
Ward-56(2), New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Ld. AO’) u/s Ananad Kumar Jindal (HUF) vs. ITO 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the
Act’) on 28/12/2017.
None was present on behalf of the assessee but the assessee has filed a letter dated 16/06/2023 and submitted that the dispute in the impugned appeal had been settled by availing the Direct Tax Vivad se Viswas Scheme, 2020 and certificate in Form No.5 has been received from the competent authority. In view of the same, the assessee prayed for withdrawal of the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed as withdrawn.
The Ld. Sr. DR for Revenue expressed no objection against withdrawal of the appeal by the assessee.
In view of the above, the appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced in the open court on 31st July, 2023.