HIL (INDIA) LIMITED,DELHI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that in light of the NCLT's order admitting the CIRP and imposing a moratorium, the present appeal filed by the assessee was not maintainable.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal was filed against an order of the Ld. CIT(A) concerning assessment year 2018-19. The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) had admitted a petition for Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against the assessee and declared a moratorium.
What were the issues?
Whether an appeal filed by an assessee is maintainable when a moratorium has been imposed by the NCLT due to the admission of CIRP against the assessee.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 250,Section 143(3),Section 143(3A),Section 143(3B),Section 7,Section 14
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI “G” BENCH: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA & SHRI MANISH AGARWAL
Year : 2018-19] HIL (India) Ltd., vs National 2nd Floor, Core-6, e-Assessment Centre, Scope Complex, Lodhi Road, Delhi New Delhi-110003. PAN-AAACH0905Q APPELLANT RESPONDENT Appellant by Shri Ankur Sharma, CA Respondent by Shri Pradumna Kumar Singh, Sr.DR Date of Hearing 03.09.2025 Date of Pronouncement 03.09.2025 ORDER
PER MANISH AGARWAL, AM :
The present appeal is filed by the assessee against the order dated 29.01.2025 of Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (A), National Faceless Appeal Centre (“NFAC”), Delhi [“Ld. CIT(A)”] in Appeal No. NFAC/2017-18/10031966 u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [“the Act”] arising out of assessment order dated 12.01.2021 passed u/s 143(3) read with sections 143(3A) & 143(3B) of the Act pertaining to assessment year 2018-19.
The Ld. Counsel for the Assessee submitted that the NCLT vide its order dated 30.07.2025 in CP (IB) No.404/(PB)/2024 admitted the petition for commencement of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (“CIRP”) against the Assessee under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (“the Code”) and also declared moratorium in terms of Section 14 of the Code. Further, the adjudicating authority has been directed appoint Interim Resolution Professional and to take necessary steps as per IBC.
We have heard the contentions of both the parties and gone through the order of the NCLT dated 30.07.2025 wherein by admitting the application filed by the applicant, a moratorium has been imposed and the adjudicating authority has been directed to appoint Interim Resolution Professional and to take necessary steps as per IBC. In view of the same, the present Appeal filed by the assessee is not maintainable, accordingly, Appeal filed by the assessee is hereby, dismissed with a liberty to the assessee/parties to file appropriate application for restoration of the present Appeal, if so advised.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed. Order pronounced in the open Court on 03.09.2025.
More judgments on Section 7
- Reliance Home Finance Limited, Lower Parel… vs Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-8…ITA 1759/MUM/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed8 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
- Jaiprakash Associates Limited vs The Office of the Commissioner of Customs…W.P.(C)-10387/20262 Sept 2026
- DCIT, C-4(1), Chandigarh vs M/S Winsome Yarns Ltd, ChandigarhITA 886/CHANDI/2019[2015-16]Status: Disposed19 Mar 2026AY 2015-16
- M/S Winsome Yarns Ltd., Chandigarh vs ACIT, C-4(1), ChandigarhITA 571/CHANDI/2019[2015-16]Status: Disposed19 Mar 2026AY 2015-16
- ACIT, Chandigarh vs M/S Winsome Yarn Ltd., ChandigarhITA 31/CHANDI/2010[2006-07]Status: Disposed19 Mar 2026AY 2006-07
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Asian Aura vs. Government Of Nct Of Delhi And Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shining Steel Through Its Proprietor Kartik Gupta vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Redamancy World Through Its Proprietor Sanjay Kumar Goel vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Arj Exim INDIA vs. Additional Commissioner Of CGST, Appeals-Ii, New Delhi And OrsDelhi · 27 Oct 2026
- The State Of Bihar Through The Commissioner Of State Tax vs. Kaushlendra KumarPatna · 27 Oct 2026