BOOST MEDIA INTERNATIONAL P.LTD,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1(!)(2), INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, NEW DELHI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 2304/DEL/2022Status: DisposedITAT Delhi10 August 2023AY 2014-155 pages

In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer's approach of restricting TDS credit based on the profit and loss account was incorrect. The assessee is entitled to TDS credit for the amount actually deducted, provided the corresponding income is offered to tax.

What were the facts?

The assessee claimed TDS credit of Rs. 1,74,37,335 on receipts of Rs. 11,83,98,431. However, the Assessing Officer allowed credit only for Rs. 1,27,33,751, citing lower receipts disclosed in the profit and loss account.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was the discrepancy in the TDS credit allowed by the Assessing Officer versus the amount claimed by the assessee. The dispute revolved around whether TDS credit should be restricted based on disclosed receipts in the P&L account.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 154

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH: D NEW DELHI

Before: SHRI G.S. PANNU, PRESIDENET & SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY, VICE-

For Appellant: Shri B.R. Datt, FCAS
For Respondent: Shri Sanjay Kumar, Sr. DR
Hearing: 02.08.2023Pronounced: 10.08.2023

Date of hearing 02.08.2023 Date of pronouncement 10.08.2023 ORDER ��������������������������������� � This is an appeal by the assessee against order dated 27.07.2022 passed by learned Commissioner of Income-Tax(Appeals), Delhi-42 for the assessment year 2014-15. 2. We have heard the parties and perused the material available on record.

2 /Del/2022 Assessment Yr: 2014-15 � 3. The dispute in the present appeal is in relation to non-grant of TDS to the extent of Rs.47,83,554. It is the contention of the assessee that in the year under consideration, it has received payment of Rs.11,83,98,431 on which tax amounting to Rs.1,74,37,335 was deducted at source. Whereas, the Assessing Officer has allowed credit for an amount of Rs.1,27,33,751 only.

4.

Having perused the material available on record, we find, assessee has computed its taxable income for the assessment year under dispute as under:

3 /Del/2022 Assessment Yr: 2014-15 � 5. From the computation of income as reproduced above, it is observed that the assessee has raised invoice of Rs.12.61,60,687 and received payment of Rs.11,83,98,431 on which TDS amounting to Rs.1,74,37,335 was deducted. While disposing of the rectification application filed by the assessee under Section 154 of the Income-Tax Act, 1961, the Assessing Officer has granted TDS credit of Rs.1,27,33,751 by stating that as per the profit and loss account, the assessee has disclosed receipts of Rs.9,18,56,817. In our view, the aforesaid approach of the Assessing Officer cannot be accepted. The computation of taxable income clearly indicates that the assessee has shown income of Rs.12,61,50,687, though, it has received payment of Rs.11,83,98,431 on which TDS of Rs.1,74,37,335 has been withheld. Therefore, the assessee remains entitled for credit of TDS actually deducted subject to, condition that corresponding income has been offered to tax.

6.

In view of the aforesaid, we direct the Assessing Officer to verify the actual income/receipts of the assessee by examining the computation of income, TDS certificate, Form 26AS and other relevant documents, if any, and thereafter allow the credit for tax 4 ITA No.2303 /Del/2022 Assessment Yr: 2014-15 � deducted at source as claimed by the assessee. Needless to mention, the Assessing Officer must extend reasonable opportunity of being heard to the assessee before deciding the issue. Grounds are allowed for statistical purposes.

7.

In the result, the appeal is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open court on .08.2023. Sd/- Sd/- ( G.S. PANNU ) (SAKTIJIT DEY) PRESIDENT VICE-PRESIDENT Dated:10 th August, 2023 Mohan Lal

More judgments on Section 154

All 8,676 judgments and leading authorities on Section 154 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →