DCIT, CIRCLE - 19(1), DELHI vs. RENEW WIND ENERGY (KARNATAKA) PVT. LTD., DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the CIT(A) had deleted the disallowance after examining the financial statements and finding that the amount was already offered to tax, thus avoiding a double addition. The Tribunal found the CIT(A)'s deletion to be justified.
What were the facts?
The assessee, engaged in power generation, filed its return of income. The return was processed, and additions were made, leading to a demand. The assessee contended that the proposed adjustments were already offered to tax and should be considered void ab initio.
What were the issues?
Whether the addition made by the revenue constituted a double disallowance and if the CIT(A) was justified in deleting the addition.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI ‘A’ BENCH,
Before: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA, & SHRI NAVEEN CHANDRA
PER NAVEEN CHANDRA, AM :-
This appeal by the Revenue is directed against the order of the ld.
CIT(A, Thane dated 24.07.2024 pertaining to A.Y 2021-22. 2. The solitary grievance raised by the Revenue reads as under:
ITA No. 4315 /DEL/2024 [A.Y 2021-22
“Whether on facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in deleting the disallowance of Rs.25,18,25,750/- holding the same as double disallowance without reconciling the figures reflecting in financials vis a vis ITR in respect of gain on settlement of financial liabilities-." (II) "The appellant craves to
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 139(1)
- Ashok Singh, Jaipur vs ACIT, Circle-2 Jaipur, JaipurITA 1540/JPR/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Haresh Sharma, Ahmedabad vs ITO, Ward 5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2125/AHD/2026[2019-2020]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2019-2020
- Nitinbhai Nanalal Badani, Rajkot vs CIT (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal…ITA 658/RJT/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Nitinbhai Nanalal Badani, Rajkot vs CIT(Appeals), National Faceless Appeal…ITA 485/RJT/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Mata Lachmi Rotary Charitable Society… vs Income Tax Officer, Exemption Ward - 1…ITA 310/RJT/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- S. Nithyananda vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Venkadeswara Grill Works vs. The Joint Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026
- Mufti Clothing And Co vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026