SHRI AMIT SINGH ,PATHANKOT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-6 (1), PATHANKOT

PDF
ITA 247/ASR/2023Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar10 November 2023AY 2010-11Bench: DR. M. L. MEENA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SH. ANIKESH BANERJEE (Judicial Member)3 pages

No AI summary yet for this case.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AMRITSAR BENCH, AMRITSAR

Before: DR. M. L. MEENA & SH. ANIKESH BANERJEE

For Respondent: Smt. Ratinder Kaur, Sr. DR
Hearing: 07.11.2023Pronounced: 10.11.2023

Per Dr. M. L. Meena, AM:

Both the captioned appeals have been filed by the assessee against the order of the ld. CIT(A) National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi even dated 28.06.2023 in respect of Assessment Year: 2010-11.

2.

At the outset, the ld. counsel for the assessee submitted that the assessee has withdrawn the appeals vide his letter dated 29.07.2021 filed before the ld. CIT(A) stating therein as under:

2 ITA Nos. 246 & 247/Asr/2023 Amit Singh v. ITO

3.

Consequent to the order of the ld. Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-1,

Amritsar u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the assessment order has been

3 ITA Nos. 246 & 247/Asr/2023 Amit Singh v. ITO declared as non-est. Thus, the appeals against the said assessment order which is vacated by the ld. Pr. CIT has become infructuous.

4.

Accordingly, he prayed that the appeals filed against the assessment order and consequently penalty order in ITA Nos. 246 & 247/Asr/2023 respectively may be treated as withdrawn.

5.

The ld. DR has no objection to the request of the assessee.

6.

Accordingly, the subject appeals are allowed to be withdrawn.

7.

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed as withdrawn.

Order pronounced in the open court on 10.11.2023

Sd/- Sd/- (Anikesh Banerjee) (Dr. M. L. Meena) Judicial Member Accountant Member *GP/Sr.PS* Copy of the order forwarded to: (1) The Appellant: (2) The Respondent: (3) The CIT concerned (4) The Sr. DR, I.T.A.T. True Copy By Order

SHRI AMIT SINGH ,PATHANKOT vs INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-6 (1), PATHANKOT | BharatTax