RAHISH PAL SINGH (THROUGH LEGAL HEIR PREMLATA),GAUTAMBUDH NAGAR vs. ITO, WARD 3(2), GAUTAMBUDH NAGAR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessee was not provided with a due opportunity of hearing by the authorities below. Therefore, the matter was restored to the AO for fresh reassessment after providing due opportunity.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal was filed against an ex parte order passed by the CIT(A) for AY 2012-13. The AO had also passed an ex parte order under Section 144 read with Section 147.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee was provided with a proper opportunity of hearing before the AO and CIT(A)? Whether the ex parte assessment orders were valid?
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “SMC” NEW DELHI
आदेश /O R D E R This appeal has been filed against the order of Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-NFAC, Delhi dated 27.04.2022 for AY 2012-13.
At the very outset, I note that the Ld. Sr. DR, in all fairness, submitted that the Department has no serious objection if the matter is restored to the file of AO for re-framing of scrutiny assessment order.
I.T.A.No.1546/Del/2022
On careful consideration of above submissions, we note that the AO passed ex parte order u/s 144 r.w.s. 147 of the I.T. Act, 1961 on 21.12.2019 and the Ld.CIT(A) also passed ex parte order on 27.04.2022. Thus, I have no hesitation to hold that the assessee has not provided due opportunity of hearing by the authorities below.
Therefore, the matter is restored to the file of AO for afresh framing of reassessment order u/s 147/143(3) of the Act after allowing due opportunity of hearing to the assessee and without being influenced with the earlier assessment and first appellate order. Accordingly, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in the open court on 30/08/2023
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Rajkalpana Travels PVT. LTD. vs. Commissioner CGST, Delhi North CommissionerateDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Mahaveer Ispat Traders vs. Principal Commissioner Dgst Delhi Department Of Trade And Taxes Gnctd & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Utkal Suppliers,Ganjam vs. Assistant Commissioner Of CT And GST, Ganjam-I Circle,GanjamOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of Hte Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of The Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026