DISTRIBUTED SOLAR POWER ASSOCIATION,NEW DELHI vs. CIT(E), NEW DELHI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the appeal was barred by limitation due to the delay and the absence of a properly filed application for condonation of delay. The assessee failed to provide sufficient facts and attestation in their condonation application.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the order dismissing their application for registration under Section 12A of the Income Tax Act. The appeal was filed with a significant delay and lacked proper documentation for condonation of delay.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal filed beyond the prescribed limitation period, without a proper condonation of delay application, is maintainable.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH: ‘B’: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI N.K. BILLAIYA & SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA
This appeal has been preferred by the Assessee against the order dated 28.09.2018 in case No. CIT(E)/12A/D-2048/2018-19/9037 passed by Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), New Delhi, dismissing application for Registration u/s 12A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred as ‘the Act’)
None appeared by the assessee and the case was called for hearing and the record shows notices have been issued to the assessee on various occasion. The ITA No.- 30/Del/2019 Distributed Solar Power Associatiion impugned order U/s 12AA of the Act was passed on 28.9.2018 and appeal was instituted on 03.01.2019 with a delay of 37 days. Earlier on 8.2.2022, the Bench has observed that the assessee is directed to remove the defect in the appeal as no application for condonation of delay has been filed. The record shows the condonation of delay application is on record, which has no facts necessary to adjudicate the question on sufficiency of reasons. The affidavit filed along with the application also does not disclose such facts and even is not attested as required under the law. In the light of aforesaid facts, the appeal is dismissed barred by limitation.
Order pronounced in the Open Court on 14.09.2023
More judgments on Section 12A
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sanskardham Nandan, Mehsana vs CIT(Exemption), AhmedabadITA 2980/AHD/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 777/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 776/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shiva Shiksha Samiti, Deendayal Puram, Up… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption, Agra…ITA 415/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Vandemataram Projects Private Limited vs. Raipur Development AuthorityChhattisgarh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Surya Prakash Aroma vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 OthersAllahabad · 27 Oct 2026
- Mrs. Aqsa Begum vs. Union Of INDIATelangana · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Govindjee Dairy Milk Private Limited vs. Central Goods And Services TaxRajasthan · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S. V J Petro Products vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St) - IiiAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026