ASSTT.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-2, NAGPUR vs. M/S WESTERN COALFIELDS LIMITED, NAGPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the appeal was not maintainable as it did not fall under the exceptions provided by the CBDT circular. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(A) for assessment year 2010-11. The tax effect involved in the appeal was below the monetary limit prescribed by the CBDT.
What were the issues?
Maintainability of the appeal due to low tax effect as per CBDT circular.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, NAGPUR
Before: SHRI R.S. SYAL & SHRI S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI
आदेश / ORDER
PER S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI, JM :
This appeal by the Revenue against the order dated 20-02-2018 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-2, Nagpur [‘CIT(A)’] for assessment year 2010-11.
Admittedly, the tax effect involved in the appeal is below monetary limit fixed by the CBDT Circular vide its latest Circular No. 17/2019, dated 08-08-2019 and are not falling under the exceptions provided under the above said circular. Thus, grounds raised by the Revenue in the appeal fails and the appeal is not maintainable. Therefore, the appeal of Revenue is dismissed as withdrawn in terms of CBDT Circular mentioned here-in- above, with a liberty to file appropriate application for restoration of appeal to the file.
In the result, the appeal of Revenue is dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open court on 27th July, 2023.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- S. Nithyananda vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Ritik vs. State Of M.P.Madhya Pradesh · 16 Oct 2026
- Venkadeswara Grill Works vs. The Joint Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026