SHRI. GIRDHARILAL MADHAVDAS RAMRAKHYA,DHULE vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX -1, NASHIK
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal permitted the assessee to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was consequently dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against a revision order passed by the PCIT. The assessee later sought to withdraw the appeal, stating it had become infructuous as the Assessing Officer had accepted the assessee's claim in the original assessment.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal filed against a revision order has become infructuous and can be withdrawn by the assessee.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCH, ‘A’ PUNE
Before: SHRI R.S. SYAL & SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY
This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order passed by the PCIT-1, Nashik on 18-03-2020 passed u/s.263 of the Income- tax Act, 1961 in relation to the assessment year 2015-16.
Before us, the assessee has filed a letter dated 07.10.2021 seeking withdrawal of the appeal. The relevant contents of such letter reads as under:
“This is the assessee’s appeal against the revision order u/s.263 for A.Y.2015-16. It is submitted that in the asst. Order passed u/s.143(3) r.w.s.263, the A.O. has accepted the claim of the assessee and no addition has been made. Hence, it is submitted that the present appeal filed against the revision order u/s.263 has become infructuous and therefore, the assessee prays for withdrawal of the present appeal. The assessee would be grateful if the appeal is permitted to be withdrawn.”
The ld. DR did not raise any objection to the withdrawal of the appeal filed by the assessee. As such, the assessee is permitted to withdraw the appeal.
In the result, the appeal is dismissed as ‘withdrawn’. Order pronounced in the Open Court on 08th October, 2021.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Shashibhusan Moharana vs. The Superintendent Of CGST And Central Excise, DhenkanalOrissa · 4 Nov 2026
- M/S Sanjeevini Health Care vs. M/S.Vijayalakshmi And AssociatesKarnataka · 4 Nov 2026
- Trilok Chandra vs. State Tax OfficerUttarakhand · 4 Nov 2026
- Basant Ballabh Punetha vs. State Of UttarakhandUttarakhand · 4 Nov 2026
- Satyavan vs. Commissioner Central Goods And Services Tax CommissionerUttarakhand · 4 Nov 2026