ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CIRCLE-1, JAMMU vs. MESERS KASHMIR STEEL ROLLING MILLS, JAMMU
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal, in view of CBDT circular dated 8th August 2019, dismissed the revenue's appeals as withdrawn. The department was granted liberty to seek recall if exceptions applied.
What were the facts?
The revenue filed appeals before the ITAT against orders favorable to the assessee. The tax effect in these appeals did not exceed Rs. 50,00,000/-.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the maintainability of revenue appeals before the ITAT in light of the CBDT circular setting monetary limits for filing appeals.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
N/A
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AMRITSAR BENCH, AMRITSAR
Before: DR. M. L. MEENA & SH. ANIKESH BANERJEE
ORDER Per Dr. M. L. Meena, AM:
Both the revenue appeals called into question the correctness of the relief granted by the CIT(A) where the tax effect involved in these two appeals does not exceeds Rs. 50,00,000/- in an individual appeals.
Therefore, in view of CBDT circular dated 8th August 2019, both these appeals were heard together and disposed of by this consolidated order. Assessment Year: 2010-11
The ld. Counsel for the assessees Sh. R. K. Gupta, CA has referred to the CBDT circular dated 8th August 2019 and demonstrated that as to how the appeals are not maintainable in the light of the CBDT circular dated 8th August 2019, whereby the income tax department has announced its policy decision not to file, or press, the appeals, before this Tribunal, against the appellate orders favourable to the assessee in the cases in which overall tax effect, including surcharge but excluding interest, is Rs 50,00,000 or less and thus, both these appeals are liable to be dismissed as withdrawn by the department.
Although, the Ld. DR has no objection, to the assessee request that these cases are covered by CBDT circular as above. However,he rquested that that the department may be given liberty to point out, upon necessary further verifications, and to seek recall of the dismissal of appeals and restoration if fall under given exceptions. We make it clear that the appellants shall be at liberty to point out the case which is wrongly disposed of summarily, either owing to wrong computation of tax effect. or owing to such cases being covered by the permissible exceptions, or for Assessment Year: 2010-11 any other reason, and we will take appropriate remedial steps in this regard. In the above view, considering the CBDT Circular dated 8th August, 4. 2019, both these appeals, involving tax effect of Rs 50 lakhs or less than, are hereby dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, the Revenue appeals are dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open court on 13.06.2022.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dr.Sunil Kumar Padhi vs. The Chief Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- N.K Fashion Through It Proprietor Mr. Narender Agarwal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Delhi EastDelhi · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetanj Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Namita Behera vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026