INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 03(1), VARANASI vs. SMT. RACHANA ARORA, NEW DELHI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee settled the tax dispute under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. Consequently, the Revenue's appeal was allowed to be withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal against the CIT(A)'s order for AY 2012-13. The assessee opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020, and the Competent Authority issued Form No. 5, accepting the declaration.
What were the issues?
Whether the Revenue's appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn due to the assessee's settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, CIRCUIT BENCH, VARANASI
Before: SHRI.VIJAY PAL RAO & SHRI RAMIT KOCHAR
O R D E R PER VIJAY PAL RAO, J.M. This appeal by the Revenue is directed against the order dated 08.09.2020 of CIT(A) for the assessment year 2012-13.
At the time of hearing, learned Sr. DR has submitted that the assessee has opted for Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020 to settle the tax dispute for the year under consideration and the Competent Authority has issued Form No. 5 under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020 on 3.3.2022. The learned Sr. DR has filed a copy of Form No. 5 issued by the Competent Authority. Thus, the learned Sr. DR has submitted that this appeal of the Revenue may be allowed to be withdrawn and consequentially the same may be dismissed as withdrawn.
Having considered the submissions of the learned Sr. DR and carefully gone through the Form No. 5 issued by the Competent Authority dated 3.3.2022, we find that the assessee has opted for Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020 to settle the tax dispute for the assessment year under consideration. The present appeal
ITA No. 133/VNS/2020 Smt. Archana Arora of the Revenue is the only litigation arising from the assessment under section 147 r.w.s. 144 for the year under consideration, as the learned CIT(A) while passing the impugned order has deleted the entire addition made by the AO.
Accordingly, when the assessee has settled the tax dispute under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020 and the Competent Authority has accepted the declaration filed by the assessee by issuing Form No. 5 dated 3.3.2022, the present appeal of the Revenue is allowed to be withdrawn and consequentially dismissed being withdrawn.
In the result, the appeal of the Department is dismissed being withdrawn as the assessee has settled the tax dispute under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020. Order pronounced in the open Court after conclusion of hearing on 06.07.2022 in the presence of both the parties.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S.Surveillance System, Sambalpur vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST Odisha , CT And GST Commissionerate , Cuttack OdishaOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- M/S.Himansu Palei vs. Assistant Commissioner Central GST CBIC Keonjhar Division, KeonjharOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- M/S. Access Worldwide Cargo vs. The Commissioner Of CustomsKarnataka · 3 Nov 2026
- M/S Greenlam Industries LTD And Another vs. The UOI And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 3 Nov 2026
- M/S Sahoo Supply Agency,Balasore vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs,New DelhiOrissa · 3 Nov 2026