COILS & TRANSFORMER INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT CIRCLE 4(2), NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the quantum appeal's decision has a bearing on the penalty appeal. Therefore, both appeals should be decided together by the CIT(Appeals).
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against a penalty order under Section 270A, while the quantum appeal was still pending. The assessee argued that the penalty order was void as it was based on a show cause notice that was never issued.
What were the issues?
Whether a penalty appeal can be decided before the related quantum appeal, and the validity of a penalty order passed without a proper show cause notice.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, [ DELHI BENCH “S.M.C.” : DELHI ]
Before: SHRI CHALLA NAGENDRA PRASAD
आदेश / O R D E R PER C. N. PRASAD, J. M. :
This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [hereinafter referred to CIT (Appeals)]/National Faceless Appeal Centre [NFAC] Delhi, dated 21.06.2023 for assessment year 2017-18.
The ld. Counsel for the assessee, at the outset, submits that this appeal is filed against the penalty order passed under section 270A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) and the quantum appeal is still pending before the ld. CIT (Appeals). The Ld. Counsel for the assessee submits that the decision in quantum appeal has a barring on the penalty levied by the Assessing Officer and the ld. CIT (Appeals) should have disposed of the quantum appeal first instead of penalty appeal. The Ld. Counsel for the assessee further submits that the penalty order is void ab initio having been passed pursuant to show cause notice dated 25.12.2019 which in fact was never issued and is sine qua non for passing the penalty order. The Ld. Counsel submits that this legal ground has been taken for the first time before the Tribunal.
The ld. DR has no serious objection in restoring this appeal to the ld. CIT (Appeals) for deciding along with the quantum appeal.
On hearing both the sides I am of the view that this appeal should go back to the ld. CIT (Appeals) and the ld. CIT (Appeals) shall decide both the quantum appeal as well as the penalty appeal together as the decision in quantum appeal has a barring on the appeal filed by the assessee against the penalty levied under section 270A of the Act. Thus, this appeal is restored to the file of the ld. CIT (Appeals) and the same shall be disposed of along with the quantum appeal after providing adequate opportunity of being heard to the assessee.
In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose.
Order pronounced in the open court on : 11/10/2023.
More judgments on Section 270A
- Kamleshkumar Somalal Bhatt, Himatnagar vs Income Tax Ofifcer, Ward 1, HimatnagarITA 2130/AHD/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Haresh Sharma, Ahmedabad vs ITO, Ward 5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2125/AHD/2026[2019-2020]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2019-2020
- Kkg Associates, Visakhapatnam vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 2(1)…ITA 345/VIZ/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Shamsunder Pritesh Malode, Hyderabad vs ACIT, Circle-12(1), HyderabadITA 399/HYD/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Rama Naidu Gutha, Anantapur vs ITO, Ward -1, AnantapurITA 1895/HYD/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Saraswati Enterprises vs. State Of RajasthanRajasthan · 28 Oct 2026
- Akshaya Consortium vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Dipanshu Aggarwal vs. Director General Of GST IntelligenceDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Dezinetree Projects PVT. LTD. vs. Spokes Digital Inc And AnrDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Jaydeep Jayantilal Hudaka vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 28 Oct 2026