SEAVIEW DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE 77(1), NEW DELHI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 2071/DEL/2025Status: DisposedITAT Delhi12 September 2025Bench: SHRI YOGESH KUMAR U.S. (Judicial Member), SHRI MANISH AGARWAL (Accountant Member)1 pages

In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal noted that the assessee opted for settlement under the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme and the appeal was consigned to records and treated as dismissed. However, liberty was granted to approach the Tribunal for reinstitution if the dispute is not resolved.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(A) for Assessment Year 2017-18. The assessee has opted to settle the tax arrears under The Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2024.

What were the issues?

Whether the appeal can be treated as dismissed given the assessee's opting for settlement under the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 250,Section 91

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH: ‘G’ NEW DELHI

For Appellant: Shri Harmeet Singh, CA
For Respondent: Shri Manish Gupta, Sr. DR
Hearing: 08.09.2025Pronounced: 08.09.2025
1.

This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of the Learned Addl./ Jt. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-4, Bengaluru [CIT(A) in short], dated 03.01.2025 passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act, in short) for Assessment Year 2017-18.

2.

The Ld. AR of the assessee submits that assessee has opted to settle the dispute relating to the tax arrears for the assessment year under consideration under The Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2024. It has been stated that necessary declaration in accordance with Section 91 of The Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020 has been filed by the assessee.

Seaview Developers (P.) Ltd. vs. ACIT 3. Considering the aforesaid situation, the captioned appeal is consigned to the records and treated as dismissed.

4.

However, the aforesaid is subject to a caveat that in case the dispute relating to tax arrears for the captioned assessment year is not ultimately resolved in terms of the aforestated Act, the appellant (i.e., the assessee) shall be at liberty to approach the Tribunal for reinstitution of the appeal and the Tribunal shall consider such application appropriately as per law. The respondent (i.e. the Revenue) has no objection with regard to the aforesaid caveat.

5.

In view of the aforesaid, the appeal is consigned to the records and, for statistical purposes, is treated as dismissed. Order pronounced in the open Court on 08.09.2025.

More judgments on Section 91

All 252 judgments and leading authorities on Section 91 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →