ITO, WARD-58(7), NEW DELHI vs. THE CO-OPERATIVE URBAN THRIFT & CREDIT SOCIETY LTD, DELHI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 1605/DEL/2022Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 October 2023AY 2018-19Bench: SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY (Vice President), DR. B.R.R. KUMAR (Accountant Member)4 pages
AI SummaryPartly Allowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that interest and dividend income earned from other co-operative banks is allowable as deduction under Section 80P(2)(d). However, it disallowed a portion of the deduction claimed under Section 80P(2)(c)(ii) as the conditions were not fulfilled.

What were the facts?

The assessee, a Credit Co-operative Society, claimed deduction under Section 80P for interest and dividend income earned from other banks. The Assessing Officer disallowed this, stating the deduction was only for income from other co-operative societies. The Commissioner (Appeals) allowed the deduction.

What were the issues?

The key issues were the allowability of deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) for income from co-operative banks and under Section 80P(2)(c)(ii) for interest income from other banks.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 80P(2)(d),Section 80P(2)(c)(ii)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH :H: DELHI

Before: SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY, VICE- & DR. B.R.R. KUMAR

For Appellant: Shri Pranshu Singhal, CA
For Respondent: Shri Amit Katoch, Sr. DR, Shri Pranshu Singhal, CA
Hearing: 12.10.2023Pronounced: 27.10.2023

O R D E R PER SAKTIJIT DEY, VICE PRESIDENT: This is an appeal by the Revenue against order dated 31.05.2022 passed by National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi for the assessment year 2018-19.

2.

The present appeal raises two issues. The first issue is with regard to availability of deduction under Section 80P(2)(d)-(i) of the Income- Tax Act,1961 in respect of interest/dividend income earned from other Co-operative Banks and second issue relates to allowability of deduction

Section 80P(2)(c)(ii) in respect of interest income earned from other co-operative banks.

3.

Briefly, the facts are, assessee is a Credit Co-operative Society and assessed in the status of Association of Persons (AOP). In the return of income filed for the assessment year under dispute, assessee had claimed deduction under Section 80P(2) in respect of interest income earned from other co-operative banks as well as nationalized banks. While examining the issue in course of assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer observed that deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) of the Act is available on interest income earned from other co-operative societies and not from banks. Accordingly, he disallowed assessee’s claim of deduction in respect of interest and dividend earned.

4.

Assessee contested the aforesaid disallowance before learned First Appellate Authority.

5.

After considering the submission of the assessee and relying upon the ratio laid down in certain judicial precedents, learned Commissioner (Appeals) held that the primary activity of the assessee is lending money to its members. Therefore, the interest income earned has to be treated as income from business. He further held that the interest and dividend income earned from other co-operative banks is allowable as deduction under Section 80P(2)(d). In so far as interest earned from the other banks, learned Commissioner (Appeals) held that since such interest of Rs.37,712 is below the threshold limit of Rs.50,000, it can be allowed as deduction under Section 80P(2)(c)(ii) of the Act.

6.

We have considered rival submissions and perused the material on record.

7.

In so far as the issue relating to allowability of deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) in respect of interest and dividend income earned from investments made in other co-operative banks, we do not find any infirmity in the decision of learned Commissioner (Appeals) as there are plethora of decisions of Tribunal holding that co-operative banks will have same status as that of co-operative societies.

8.

As regards the allowance of deduction of Rs.37,712 under Section 80P(2)(c)(ii) of the Act, we are unable to agree with the decision of the learned First Appellate Authority as the conditions of the said provision, in our view, are not fulfilled. This is so because, it cannot be said,

assessee is engaged in any activity other than the activities provided under Section 80P(2)(a) and (b). Therefore, we sustain disallowance of Rs.37,712.

More judgments on Section 80P(2)(d)

All 2,440 judgments and leading authorities on Section 80P(2)(d) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →