M/S B.HIMMATLAL AGRAWAL,NAGPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER 4(4), NAGPUR
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessee failed to provide factual foundation for the claim that interest paid to NBFCs was in the nature of hire purchase charges. Therefore, the provisions of Section 194A were applicable, and the disallowance was upheld.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a partnership firm, filed a return of income declaring Nil income. The Assessing Officer disallowed interest paid to NBFCs of Rs. 1,21,29,696/- under Section 40(a)(ia) for failure to deduct TDS. The CIT(A) allowed relief for some parties but confirmed disallowance for others.
What were the issues?
Whether interest paid to NBFCs is considered hire purchase charges, exempting the payer from TDS obligations under Section 194A.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR – VIRTUAL COURT
Before: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO & SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY
ORDER
PER INTURI RAMA RAO, AM:
This is an appeal filed by the assessee directed against the order of ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, Nagpur [‘the CIT(A)’] dated 20.06.2019 for the assessment year 2014-15.
Briefly, the facts of the case are that the appellant is a partnership firm engaged in the business of transport contractor, civil and supply of labour. The Return of Income for the assessment year 2014-15 was filed on 29.11.2014 declaring total income of Rs.Nil. Against the said return of income, the assessment was completed by the Income Tax Officer, Ward-4(4), Nagpur (‘the Assessing Officer’) vide order dated 29.12.2016 passed u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’) at a total income of Rs.1,22,14,639/-. While doing so, the Assessing Officer disallowed interest of Rs.1,21,29,696/- u/s 40(a)(ia) of the Act on the ground that the appellant had failed to deduct tax at source on the interest paid to the following parties :- Sr. No. Name Amount 01 Shriram Equipment Finance Company 1390928 Limited 02 Mahindra & Mahindra Finance Limited 4548361.36 03 Tata Motors Limited 5372440.69 04 India Bulls Housing Finance Limited (short 5641 interest shown) 05 Tata Capital Finance Limited (short 40020 interest shown) 06 SREI Equipment Finance Limited (short 772304.76 interest shown) 1,21,29,695.81 3. Being aggrieved by the above disallowances, an appeal was filed before the ld. CIT(A), who vide impugned order held that the in respect of the parties i.e. Tata Motors Limited and Shriram Equipment Finance Company Limited, the appellant had filed Form 26AS received from the said parties, therefore, directed the Assessing Officer to allow the same and addition in respect of balance parties was confirmed by the ld. CIT(A). 4. Being aggrieved, the appellant is in appeal before us in the present appeal.
More judgments on Section 40(a)(ia)
- Rekha Agarwal, Jaipur vs ITO WD 4(1), JaipurITA 844/JPR/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Cdg Petchem Limited, Hyderabad vs ITO, Ward - 1(1), HyderabadITA 1900/HYD/2025[2018-2019]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-2019
- M/S. Shree Laminators Ltd., Kolkata vs DCIT, Circle 4(4), KolkataITA 1534/KOL/2026[2011-2012]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2011-2012
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S B.K. Agency Under The Proprietor Of Bhola Prasad vs. The Chief Commissioner, CGSTPatna · 2 Nov 2026
- R.K.Service Station, Balasore vs. Commissioner CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- Tankala Soumya vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Rayagada Circle, RayagadaOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Pooja, Town Hallroad, Cuttack vs. State Tax Officer, Cuttack-I West Circle,CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Chicvogue Fashions Lip, Ganjam vs. State Tax Officer Bhubaneswar- Ii CircleOrissa · 31 Oct 2026