M/S B.HIMMATLAL AGRAWAL,NAGPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER 4(4), NAGPUR

PDF · subscribers
ITA 194/NAG/2019Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur12 October 2023AY 2014-15Bench: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO (Accountant Member), SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY (Judicial Member)4 pages

In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the assessee failed to provide factual foundation for the claim that interest paid to NBFCs was in the nature of hire purchase charges. Therefore, the provisions of Section 194A were applicable, and the disallowance was upheld.

What were the facts?

The assessee, a partnership firm, filed a return of income declaring Nil income. The Assessing Officer disallowed interest paid to NBFCs of Rs. 1,21,29,696/- under Section 40(a)(ia) for failure to deduct TDS. The CIT(A) allowed relief for some parties but confirmed disallowance for others.

What were the issues?

Whether interest paid to NBFCs is considered hire purchase charges, exempting the payer from TDS obligations under Section 194A.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 40(a)(ia),Section 194A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR – VIRTUAL COURT

Before: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO & SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY

For Appellant: Shri Naresh Jakhotia
For Respondent: Shri Rajat Singhai
Hearing: 25.09.2023Pronounced: 12.10.2023

ORDER

PER INTURI RAMA RAO, AM:

1.

This is an appeal filed by the assessee directed against the order of ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, Nagpur [‘the CIT(A)’] dated 20.06.2019 for the assessment year 2014-15.

2.

Briefly, the facts of the case are that the appellant is a partnership firm engaged in the business of transport contractor, civil and supply of labour. The Return of Income for the assessment year 2014-15 was filed on 29.11.2014 declaring total income of Rs.Nil. Against the said return of income, the assessment was completed by the Income Tax Officer, Ward-4(4), Nagpur (‘the Assessing Officer’) vide order dated 29.12.2016 passed u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’) at a total income of Rs.1,22,14,639/-. While doing so, the Assessing Officer disallowed interest of Rs.1,21,29,696/- u/s 40(a)(ia) of the Act on the ground that the appellant had failed to deduct tax at source on the interest paid to the following parties :- Sr. No. Name Amount 01 Shriram Equipment Finance Company 1390928 Limited 02 Mahindra & Mahindra Finance Limited 4548361.36 03 Tata Motors Limited 5372440.69 04 India Bulls Housing Finance Limited (short 5641 interest shown) 05 Tata Capital Finance Limited (short 40020 interest shown) 06 SREI Equipment Finance Limited (short 772304.76 interest shown) 1,21,29,695.81 3. Being aggrieved by the above disallowances, an appeal was filed before the ld. CIT(A), who vide impugned order held that the in respect of the parties i.e. Tata Motors Limited and Shriram Equipment Finance Company Limited, the appellant had filed Form 26AS received from the said parties, therefore, directed the Assessing Officer to allow the same and addition in respect of balance parties was confirmed by the ld. CIT(A). 4. Being aggrieved, the appellant is in appeal before us in the present appeal.

More judgments on Section 40(a)(ia)

All 7,300 judgments and leading authorities on Section 40(a)(ia) →

Latest GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →